Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

J Boopalan vs Indian Army on 7 December, 2018

                               के ीय सूचना आयोग
                         Central Information Commission
                               बाबा गंगनाथ माग, मुिनरका
                          Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                             नई द ली, New Delhi - 110067


File No : CIC/IARMY/A/2017/185013/SD

J Boopalan                                                 ....अपीलकता/Appellant
                                      VERSUS
                                       बनाम
CPIO,
Office of the Cantonment Board,
St Thomas Mount,
Chennai- 600016                                      ... ितवादीगण /Respondent

RTI application filed on          :   11/08/2017
CPIO replied on                   :   25/09/2017
First appeal filed on             :   09/10/2017
First Appellate Authority order   :   No order
Second Appeal dated               :   14/12/2017
Date of Hearing                   :   06/12/2018
Date of Decision                  :   06/12/2018

Information sought

:

The Appellant sought copy of permission received from the Competent Authority of Cantonment Head Quarters, Pune for change of running account of the Cantt. from Indian Overseas Bank, St. Thomas Mount Branch to ICICI Bank, St. Thomas Mount Branch and rationale behind choosing a private bank over other nationalized banks in the vicinity.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
The CPIO has not provided the desired information.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present:-
1
Appellant: Not present.
Respondent: K. Krishnamoorthy, Office Supdt. & CPIO, Cantonment Board, Chennai present through VC.
CPIO submitted that appropriate reply has been provided to the Appellant.
Decision Commission has gone through the case records and observes that appropriate reply has been provided to the Appellant by the CPIO. Commission upholds the submission of the CPIO. No further action lies.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Divya Prakash Sinha ( द काश िस हा ) Information Commissioner ( सूचना आयु ) Authenticated true copy (अ भ मा णत स या पत त) Haro Prasad Sen Dy. Registrar 011-26106140 / [email protected] हरो साद सेन, उप-पंजीयक दनांक / Date 2