Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Gauhati High Court

Manik Dev Chouhan And Anr vs The State Of Assam on 14 February, 2020

                                                                                       Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010010522020




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                     Case No. : AB 203/2020

            1:MANIK DEV CHOUHAN AND ANR.
            S/O RAMAYAN CHOUHAN, R/O BADLA BHATA, BOKPARA, LINE NO. 3, P.O.-
            DOOMDOOMA, P.S.-DOOMDOOMA, DIST-TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786151


            2: RAVI SHANKAR CHOUHAN
             S/O RAJAH CHOUHAN
             R/O BASHBARI DIHINGIABASTI
             COURT ROAD HIJUGURI
             P.O. AND P.S.-TINSUKIA
             DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM
             PIN-78615

            VERSUS

            1:THE STATE OF ASSAM
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. P MAHANTA

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM


                                    BEFORE
                       HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIR ALFAZ ALI

                                             ORDER

Date : 14-02-2020 This is an application, filed under Section 438 of the Cr.PC. seeking pre-arrest bail of the accused-petitioner, namely, 1. Sri Manik Dev Chouhan and 2. Sri Ravi Page No.# 2/2 Shankar Chouhan, apprehending arrest in connection with Phillobari PS Case No. 66/2019 under Section 302/342/143 IPC.

Heard Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam.

Perused the FIR and the documents annexed with the petition including the case diary produced today.

The allegation made in the FIR was that a person was assaulted by a mob suspecting him to be cow lifter, who ultimately succumbed to the injuries.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are no way involved in the occurrence narrated in the FIR.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and also that the petitioner has already been interrogated, this court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be necessary in the interest of investigation. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one suitable surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. The pre-arrest bail is subject to the following conditions.

1. The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days and co-operate with the investigation.

2. The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

Bail application is disposed of.

Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant