Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd vs Union Of India & Anr on 6 February, 2019

Author: V. Kameswar Rao

Bench: Chief Justice, V. Kameswar Rao

$~18
*    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    W.P.(C) 748/2018
     BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD
                                                      ..... Petitioner
                      Through: Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Adv.
                               Mr. P.S. Sudheer and
                               Ms. Anne Mathur, Advs.

                          versus

      UNION OF INDIA & ANR
                                                             ..... Respondent
                          Through:     Ms. S. Laxmi, CGSC for UOI with
                                       Mr. Siddharth Singh and Ms. Hina
                                       Bhargava, Advs. for UOI
                                       Mr. Shashi Juneja, SC for State of
                                       Chhattisgarh.
                                       Mr. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Adv. with
                                       Mr. Pallav Mongia, Adv. with
                                       Mr. Abhinav Goyal, Mr. Kaustubh
                                       Singh, Mr. Sarvesh Mishra and
                                       Mr. S. Bhaduri, Advs. for Intervener.
      CORAM:
      HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
                   ORDER

% 06.02.2019 CM No. 36580/2018 (for delay) This is an application filed by the respondents seeking condonation of 67 days delay in filing the reply.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 67 days in filing the reply is condoned. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 748/2018CM No. 46556/2018 List for final hearing on April 12, 2019. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that they do not want to file any rejoinder as only legal question involved in the matter. Copies of four legal questions formulated by the counsel for the petitioner handed over in the Court. The same are taken on record.

CHIEF JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO, J FEBRUARY 06, 2019/aky