Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Palaniappan vs The Superintending Engineer on 4 March, 2026

Author: M.Dhandapani

Bench: M.Dhandapani

                                                                                       WP No. 20549 of 2024


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                DATED: 04-03-2026
                                                         CORAM
                                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
                                               WP No. 20549 of 2024
                M.Palaniappan
                Son Of Late,Muthusamy Gounder,
                D.N0.312,Elanthakuttai, Kurumbalamahadevi,
                Jedarpalayam - 637213,Namakkal District.
                                                                                         ..Petitioner(s)
                                                              Vs
                1. The Superintending Engineer,(tangedco)
                   Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal.
                2. The Executive Engineer,(tangedco)
                   Operation And Maintenance, Paramathy Velur,
                   Namakkal.

                3. The Assistant Executive Engineer,(tangedco)
                   Nalur, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal

                4. The Assistant Engineer,(tangedco)
                   Operation And Maintenance, Solasiramani
                   Section, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal.

                5. The Assistant Engineer,(tangedco)
                   Operation And Maintenance, Jedarpalayam
                   Section, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal.

                6. K.Kuppusamy
                   Son Of Karupanna Gounder, Residing At
                   Rakkiyan Kuttai, E.Nallagoundampalayam,
                   Jaminillampalli Post, Paramathy Velur Taluk,
                   Namakkal.

                7. K.Kandhasamy
                   Son Of Kumarappa Gounder, Residing At
                   Athikadu, Jaminillampalli Post, Paramathy
                   Velur Taluk, Namakkal.



                                                                                               __________
                                                                                                Page1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 05:54:00 pm )
                                                                                              WP No. 20549 of 2024


                8. S.Kaliappan (deceased)
                   Son Of Sengoda Gounder, Resiging At
                   Vellapurakadu, Kurumbalamahadevi Post,
                   Paramathy Velur Taluk, Namakkal.

                9. Palaniammal,
                   Wife Of S.Kaliappan, Vellapurakadu,
                   Kurumbalamahadevi Post, Paramathy Velur
                   Taluk, Namakkal.

                10.K.Loganathan,
                   Son Of S.Kaliappan, Vellapurakadu,
                   Kurumbalamahadevi Post, Paramathy Velur
                   Taluk, Namakkal.(r9 And R10 Are Substituted
                   As Lrs Of Deceased R8, As Per Order Dated
                   05.03.2025 In Wmp.7955/2025 In
                   Wp.20549/2024 By Dbcj)

                                                                                              ..Respondent(s)

                Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for
                issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records of
                the               Impugned         Order             in           Ka.No.A.E/Operation        and
                Maintenance/Jedarpalayam/Ko-Kattu/No.056-24.25 dated 27.05.2024 passed by
                the 5th Respondent and to quash the same as illegal,incompetent,against the
                rules and regulations of Board and Consequently directing the Respondents-1 to
                5,immediately to effect the service connection to me under the Agricultural free
                scheme for SF No.266/2,in Jamin Ellampalli Village,Paramathy Velur
                Taluk,Namakkal District.


                              For Petitioner(s):               Mr.Ma.Pa.Thangavel
                                                               for Mr.M.Lokesh

                              For Respondent(s):               Mr.S.Kalaiselvan,for R1 To R5

                                                               No Appearance for R-6, 7, 9 & 10


                                                                                                      __________
                                                                                                       Page2 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 05:54:00 pm )
                                                                                          WP No. 20549 of 2024


                                                           ORDER

The Impugned Order in Ka.No.A.E/Operation and Maintenance/Jedarpalayam/Ko-Kattu/No.056-24.25 dated 27.05.2024 passed by the fifth respondent, is put under challenge in the present Writ Petition. Consequently, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents 1 to 5, immediately to effect the service connection to him under the Agricultural free scheme for SF No.266/2,in Jamin Ellampalli Village,Paramathy Velur Taluk,Namakkal District.

2. Heard the learned counsels appearing on either side.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner purchased the subject property from his vendor in the year 2004, where his vendor had applied for agricultural fee service connection of 5-HP for open well situated in the said property on 30.07.1986. The second respondent on 14.10.2009 requested to register the readiness with directions for any change in the owner’s name and sub divisions if any, for which the petitioner submitted a letter dated 29.11.2010 along with documents and subsequently, poles were erected by the third respondent for service connection. While so, the fourth respondent transferred the application of the petitioner to the fifth respondent intimating about not feasibility of giving connection on 30.06.2023. Thereafter, the petitioner sent __________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 05:54:00 pm ) WP No. 20549 of 2024 representation to the respondents on 20.05.2024, for which the present impugned order has been passed by the fifth respondent, stating that the petitioner’s request for service connection was rejected on the ground of objection raised by the private respondents. Challenging the same, the present Writ Petition.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that whenever an application is made for agricultural free electricity connection, it is the duty cast upon the official respondents to provide the same in terms of Supply Code and the same cannot be rejected merely on the ground of objection made by any private parties, as the same is unsustainable. He further submitted that this Court may issue a direction to the official respondents to effect service connection to the petitioner as per the procedure of Supply Code.

5. On perusal of the case reveals that the petitioner has applied for agricultural free electricity service connection to his open well as per the procedure but the same was rejected on the ground of some objections raised by the private respondents, which cannot be acceptable. The respondents ought to have followed the Supply Code so as to provide service connection to the petitioner as rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the same, the official respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.05.2024 in regard to agricultural free electricity __________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 05:54:00 pm ) WP No. 20549 of 2024 service connection and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

04-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP To

1. The Superintending Engineer,(tangedco) Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal.

2. The Executive Engineer,(tangedco) Operation And Maintenance, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal.

3. The Assistant Executive Engineer,(tangedco) Nalur, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal

4. The Assistant Engineer,(tangedco) Operation And Maintenance, Solasiramani Section, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal.

5. The Assistant Engineer,(tangedco) Operation And Maintenance, Jedarpalayam Section, Paramathy Velur, Namakkal.

__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 05:54:00 pm ) WP No. 20549 of 2024 M.DHANDAPANI, J.

DP WP No. 20549 of 2024 04-03-2026 __________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 05:54:00 pm )