Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K. Balakrishnan vs The Asst. Director Of Panchayats on 2 June, 2015

Author: T.S.Sivagnanam

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, T.S.Sivagnanam

       

  

   

 
 
 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras 
						
Dated: 02.06.2015

Coram:

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,  Chief Justice
and 
The Honourable Mr. Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
	
Writ Petition No. 14725 of 2015
and M.P. No.1 of 2015

K. Balakrishnan							.. Petitioner 

vs.

1. The Asst. Director of Panchayats
    Tiruvannamalai,  District Collectorate
    Tiruvannamalai.

2. The Block Development Officer
    Polur Panchayat Union
    Polur, Tiruvannamalai.

3.  Kelur Panchayat 
     Rep. by its Executive Officer-cum-President  
     Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai.

4.  The Secretary (Panchayat Clerk)
     Kelur Panchayat,  Polur Taluk  
     Tiruvannamalai.						.. Respondents
						---
	Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents and their subordinates or any other officials or persons tracing power or claiming right through them, from altering or modifying the physical feature/nature of the subject land 1.32.50 Hectare (around 3.50 Acres) comprised in survey Numbers in 118/2C and 118/5 in Theppandal Village  belonging to Kelur Panchayat in Polur Taluk and Tiruvannamalai District from its present position as Weekly Cattle Shandy by putting up of any construction for any other purpose.
						---
		For Petitioner 	 :   Mr. Mr. R. Neelakandan
					     for Mr. G. Muthu
		For Respondents    :   Mr. S.T.S. Murthi
					     Government Pleader for R1
					     Mr. D. Suriya Narayanan for R2 & R3
					     ---
O R D E R

(Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to maintain the writ petition, as the grievance is against the Computer Centre being made on Panchayat land. Learned counsel states that there are other encroachments/impermissible activities also going on. If that be so, the petitioner should made a representation to the Panchayat and we are sure that the Panchayat will take necessary action in accordance with law, if the allegations are found to be correct.

2. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, M.P. No.1 of 2015 is also dismissed.

Index    : yes/no			       [S.K.K., CJ]		[T.S.S., J.]
ATR						        2nd June,  2015.



Copies to;

1. The Asst. Director of Panchayats
    Tiruvannamalai,  District Collectorate
    Tiruvannamalai.

2. The Block Development Officer
    Polur Panchayat Union
    Polur, Tiruvannamalai.										
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and                     
T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.                    

ATR












W.P. No. 14725 of 2015













02.06.2015