Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Ahmedabad

Shri Pankajbhai Haribhai Patel,, ... vs The Acit, Central Circle-1(4),, ... on 1 March, 2017

           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                    AHMEDABAD "A" BENCH

          Before: Shri R. P. Tolani, Judicial Member
          And Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member

                    IT(SS)A No. 425/Ahd/2013
                    Assessment Year 2010-11


     Shri Pankajbhai                    The ACIT,
     Haribhai Patel, B/204,             Circle-1(4),
     Vasant Vihar Part-2,          Vs   Ahmedabad
     Dafnala, Shahibaug, Nr.            (Respondent)
     Mohan Cinema,
     Ahmedabad
     PAN: AHFPP2192Q
     (Appellant)


       Revenue by:          Shri James Kurian, Sr. D.R.
       Assessee by:         None

       Date of hearing                   : 01-03-2017
       Date of pronouncement             : 01-03-2017


                           आदेश /ORDER

PER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:-

This assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2010-11, arises from order of the CIT(A)-I, Ahmedabad dated 05-09-2013 in appeal no. CIT(A)- I/CC.1(4)/035/2013-14, in proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short "the Act". I.T.(SS)A No. 425/Ahd/2013 A.Y. 2010-11 Page No 2 Pankajbhai Haribai Patel vs. ACIT

2. At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellant-assessee. On previous occasion, i.e. on 21/11/2016 also assessee did not appear. Last notice of hearing was sent to the assessee on 21/11/2016 fixing the date of hearing on 01/03/2017 at the address indicated in column No. 10. Despite this, the assessee remained unrepresented. In the aforementioned peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the assessee or petition seeking time, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the appeal filed. Accordingly the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunals in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holka vs. CWT:

223 ITR480 (M.P.).

3. Before parting, it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non- representation on the date of hearing, it would be at liberty if so advised to pray for a recall of this order.

4. In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 01-03-2017 Sd/- Sd/-

  (R.P. TOLANI)                                  (AMARJIT SINGH)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                               ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ahmedabad : Dated 01/03/2017
 I.T.(SS)A No. 425/Ahd/2013     A.Y. 2010-11             Page No   3
Pankajbhai Haribai Patel vs. ACIT


आदेश क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of Order Forwarded to:-

1. Assessee
2. Revenue
3. Concerned CIT
4. CIT (A)
5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad
6. Guard file.

By order/आदेश से, उप/सहायक पंजीकार आयकर अपील य अ धकरण, अहमदाबाद