Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi vs Jagbir Singh on 6 August, 2021

     ITEM NO.20                      REGISTRAR COURT. 1 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE
     SECTION XIV

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


                                 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJESH KUMAR GOEL

                           SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 28988/2020


     GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.                                      Petitioner(s)

                                                   VERSUS

     JAGBIR SINGH & ORS.                                               Respondent(s)



     WITH
     Diary No(s). 28960/2020 (XIV)

         Diary No(s). 28985/2020 (XIV)


     Date : 06-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.



     For Petitioner(s)
                                       Ms. Rachana Srivastava, AOR

     For Respondent(s)
                                       Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey, AOR


               UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the
     Court made the following
                                  O R D E R

Diary No(s).28988/2020 As per office report ld. counsel for the petitioner has to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 8. However, ld. counsel for the petitioner requested for Signature Not Verified taking fresh steps alongwith dasti notice stating that due to Digitally signed by Indu Marwah Date: 2021.08.11 11:30:20 IST Reason: lockdown in the past, dasti notice issued earlier could not be -2- Item No.20 effected. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos.1 to 8 within two weeks time. Dasti in addition is allowed. Affidavit of dasti service be filed within four weeks time.

Respondent no.9 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

Diary No(s). 28960/2020 As per office report ld. counsel for the petitioner has to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.1. However, ld. counsel for the petitioner requested for taking fresh steps alongwith dasti notice stating that due to lockdown in the past, dasti notice issued earlier could not be effected. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.1 within two weeks time. Dasti in addition is allowed. Affidavit of dasti service be filed within four weeks time.

Service is complete on respondent no.2 but none has entered appearance.

Respondent no.3 is respondent no.9 in Diary No(s).28988/2020 and duly represented in Diary No(s).28988/2020. Diary No(s). 28985/2020 As per office report ld. counsel for the petitioner has to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent no.1. However, ld. counsel for the petitioner requested for taking fresh steps alongwith dasti notice stating that due to lockdown -3- Item No.20 in the past, dasti notice issued earlier could not be effected. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.1 within two weeks time. Dasti in addition is allowed. Affidavit of dasti service be filed within four weeks time.

Respondent no.2 is respondent no.9 in Diary No(s).28988/2020 and duly represented in Diary No(s).28988/2020. List again on 20.9.2021.

RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar