Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Dr Raju Wasudeo Mishra Nagpur vs The State Of Mah & 4 Others on 8 February, 2018

Author: B.P. Dharmadhikari

Bench: B.P. Dharmadhikari, Swapna Joshi

                                               1                            wp475.04

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR


                            WRIT PETITION  NO.475  OF 2004


1)      Dr. Raju s/o Wasudeo Mishra,
        age 48 years, occupation : service, 
        r/o 28-A,  New Urvela Colony, 
        Vivekanand Nagar, Nagpur-15. 

2)      High Court Bar Association,
        Civil Lines, Nagpur, through its 
        Secretary.                                   ...            Petitioners
                                  - Versus -
1)      The State of Maharashtra, through
        its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, 
        Mumbai -400 032. 

2)      The State of Maharashtra, through
        its Secretary, Department of Food, 
        Civil Supplies and Consumer 
        Protection, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032. 

3)      The State of Maharashtra, through
        its Secretary, Department of Finance, 
        Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400 032.

4)      The Hon'ble President, State
        Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,
        Maharashtra State, Room Nos.1 and 2, 
        Administrative College Building, 
        Hazarimal Somani Marg, Opposite 




    ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2018                       ::: Downloaded on - 14/02/2018 01:27:48 :::
                                                        2                          wp475.04

        C.S.T. Station, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001.

5)      The President,  District Consumer Disputes
        Redressal Forum, 5th Floor, New 
        Administrative Building, Civil Lines, 
        Nagpur 440001.                                     ...            Respondents
                                   -----------------
Shri S.B. Solat, Advocate for petitioners. 
Ms. T. Khan, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos.1 to 5. 
                                   ----------------
                                          CORAM :    B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND 
                                                     MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI,  JJ.
                                         DATED  :   FEBRUARY 8,  2018
 

ORAL JUDGMENT  (PER B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)  :

Adv. Solat for petitioners informs that matter has become infructuous since tenure of petitioner no.1 as member of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur is already over.

2) Ms. Khan, learned Assistant Government Pleader appears for respondents.

3) Accepting the statement of Adv. Solat, we dispose of the petition as infructuous. Rule is discharged. No costs.

                    JUDGE                                                    JUDGE

khj




    ::: Uploaded on - 13/02/2018                             ::: Downloaded on - 14/02/2018 01:27:48 :::