Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Bhagwat Digambar Ghante vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 29 August, 2017

Author: R.M. Borde

Bench: R.M. Borde

                                    (1)                              wp10221.17

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                       WRIT PETITION NO.10221 OF 2017

Arjun S/o. Rayaba Jampawad                            ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o. Kodali, Tq. Udgir,
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Deputy Collector &
      District Rehabilitation Officer
      Dist. Latur

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10209 OF 2017

Sangram Ramchandra Wajire                             ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Post Gavhan, Tq. Udgir,
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (2)                           wp10221.17


2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Tahshildar Taluka Executive
      Magistrate, Udgir, Tq. Udgir,
      Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer,
      Zilla Parishad, Latur,
      Dist. Latur

                           WITH
              WRIT PETITION NO.10210 OF 2017
 Gopal So. Harichandra Sarje              ..                 Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Post Yeloriwadi, Tq. Ausa,
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                     ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Ausa
      Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Engineer,
      MSEDCL Regional Office,
      Admin. Bldg. 1st Floor,
      Old Power Sale Galli,
      Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017         ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (3)                              wp10221.17

5.    The Executive Engineer,
      MSEDCL Division Office,
      Near Market Yard, Old Power House,
      Udgir

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10211 OF 2017

Vikas S/o. Pandurang Akoskar                          ..       Petitioner
Age-21, Occu-Student,
R/o.Kolewadi Post Wanewadi,
Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Osmanabad
      Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad

4.    Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University,
      Lonere, Dist. Rajgad-402 103 (MS),
      Through its Registrar

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10212 OF 2017

Nagesh S/o. Shamrao Sarge                             ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.Thanu Niwas, Datanagar Nilanga
Tq. Nilanga, Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (4)                              wp10221.17

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Nilanga
      Tq. Nilanga, DIst. Latur

4.    The Maharashtra State Road Transport
      Central Office, Maharashtra Transport 
      Bhavan, Dr. Anandrao Nayar, Mumbai-400 008
      Through its Chief Controller

5.    The Divisional Controller,
      State Transport, Osmanabad

6.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Nilanga
      Tq. Nilanga, Dist. Nilanga

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10213 OF 2017

Sanjeprao S/o. Pandhari Yenchewad                     ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Post Savargaon Rokada,
Tq. Ahmednagar, Dist.Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (5)                                wp10221.17

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmedpur
      Tq. Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur

4.    Shri. Mahadev Madhyamik V. Uchha 
      Madhyamik Vidhyalay, Dhanegaon,
      Through its Headmaster

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10215 OF 2017

Subhash Hanmant Gaikwad                   ..   Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.Prakash Nagar, Latur,
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                          ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Umarga
      Tq. Umarga, Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer,
      Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017              ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (6)                              wp10221.17

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10216 OF 2017

Uttam Rukhmaji Dappadwad                              ..       Petitioner
Age-48 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Kharbarwadi, Tq. Ahmedpur,
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmedpur
      Tq. Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur

4.    The State of Maharashtra
      Higher and Technical Education Department
      Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32
      Through its Secretary


                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10217 OF 2017

Sham S/o. Arjunrao Lekarwale                          ..       Petitioner
Age-38 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Salunke Nagar, Bebali Road,
Osmanabad, Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad

      Versus




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (7)                           wp10221.17

1.    The State of Maharashtra                     ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Kalamb
      Tq. Kalamb, Dist. Osmanabad

4.    The Chief Officer Nagar Parishad Osmanabad
      Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad
                            WITH
               WRIT PETITION NO.10218 OF 2017

Savita D/o. Ganpatrao Bhanje                       ..       Petitioner
Age-42 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Vikas Nagar, Udgir, 
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                     ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Udgir
      Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer
      Zilla Parishad Latur, 
      Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017         ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (8)                              wp10221.17


                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10220 OF 2017

Vijaykumar Madhavrao Rodewad                          ..       Petitioner
Age-39 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Tondar, Tq. Udgir,
Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Udgir
      Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer
      Zilla Parishad Latur, 
      Dist. Latur

5.    The Block Development Officer,
      Panchayat Samiti, Devni,
      Dist. Latur

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10219 OF 2017

Vimal D/o. Kashinathrao Mudale                        ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Post Bamani, Tq. Udgir,
Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     (9)                              wp10221.17

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Udgir
      Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer
      Zilla Parishad Latur, 
      Dist. Latur


                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10222 OF 2017

Shankar S/o. Digambar Ghante                          ..       Petitioner
Age-47 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Narayan Colony, 
Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     ( 10 )                           wp10221.17

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Ausa
      Tq. Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Officer,
      Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad 

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10223 OF 2017

Ramling S/o. Dhondiba Patange                         ..       Petitioner
Age-49 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Devlali, Tq. & Dist. Osmanabad

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Osmanabad
      Tq. Dist. Osmanabad

4.    Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission
      Co. Ltd. Vidyut Bhavan, Old Power Premises,
      Khokadpura, Aurangabad 431 001
      Through its Chief Engineer

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10224 OF 2017

Balaji S/o. Shamrao Bandewad                          ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.Kolwadi Post-Sawargaon,
Tq. Ahamadpur, Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     ( 11 )                           wp10221.17


      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmadpur
      Dist. Latur

                           WITH
              WRIT PETITION NO.10226 OF 2017
Gopal S/o.Bapurao Ankushwad              ..                    Petitioner
Age-Major years, Occu-Service,
R/o.Kolewadi Post-Savargaon,
Tq. Ahamadpur, Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmadpur
      Tq. Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer,
      Zila Parishad, Latur
      Tq. & Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     ( 12 )                           wp10221.17


                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10225 OF 2017

Bhagwat S/o. Digambar Ghante                          ..       Petitioner
Age-59 years, Occu-Nill,
R/o.Upchunda, Post-Jawali,
Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Ausa
      Dist. Latur

4.    The Chief Executive Officer,
      Zila Parishad, Osmanabad

                           WITH
              WRIT PETITION NO.10227 OF 2017
Suryakant S/o. Maroti Sarge              ..                    Petitioner
Age-53 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Hasala, Post-Budhoda,
Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     ( 13 )                           wp10221.17


2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Ausa
      Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur

4.    The District Civil Surgeon, Latur
      Near Gandhi Chowk, Police Station,
      Old Z.P.School, Latur-413 512
      Dist. Latur


                                    WITH

                       WRIT PETITION NO.10229 OF 2017

Chandrahas S/o. Manik Surwase                         ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Post Selu,
Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Ausa
      Tq. Ausa, Dist. Latur




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     ( 14 )                           wp10221.17

                                    WITH
                       WRIT PETITION NO.10228 OF 2017

Appasha S/o. Sidram Koli                              ..       Petitioner
Age-53 years, Occu-Service,
R/o.At Asta (Kasar), Tq. Lohara,
Dist. Osmanabad

      Versus

1.    The State of Maharashtra                        ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Executive Magistrate, Umarga
      Tq. Umarga, Dist. Osmanabad

4.    The Executive Engineer, Latur
      Latur Irrigation Division Latur,
      Sinchan Bhavan Old Aus Road,
      Latur


                                    WITH

                       WRIT PETITION NO.10230 OF 2017

Anant Marotirao Tarlawad                              ..       Petitioner
Age-Major, Occu-Service,
R/o.Rajura (Bu), Tq. Mukhed,
Dist. Nandad

      Versus




     ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017            ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::
                                     ( 15 )                            wp10221.17

1.    The State of Maharashtra                         ..       Respondents
      Department of Tribal Development,
      Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
      Through its Secretary

2.    Scheduled Tribe Certificate
      Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad
      Through its Member Secretary

3.    The Tahasildar & Taluka Executive 
      Magistrate, Mukhed,
      Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded

4.    The Chief Executive Officer,
      Zilla Parishad, Latur

5.    The Education Officer (Secondary),
      Zilla Parishad, Latur

6.    Bapuji Madhyamik Va Uchya Madhyamik
      Vidhyalay, Sawagaon,
      Through its Headmaster

Mr.Vivek U. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr.P.S.Patil, AGP for the respondents/State
Mr.P.R.Patil, Advocate for respondents/Z.P.Latur in writ 
petition   Nos.10226,10230,10209,10218,10219   and   10220   of 
2017
                             CORAM :  R.M. BORDE &
                                      S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
                             DATED : 29.08.2017

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER:R.M. BORDE, J.]:-
.              Heard.
.              Rule.   Rule   made   returnable   forthwith.   By   the 

consent of the learned counsel for the parties heard finally at the admission stage.

::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::

( 16 ) wp10221.17

2. The petitioners are taking exception to the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee directing cancellation of caste certificate issued to them on the ground of occurrence of spelling mistake in recording the name of the Tribe in the caste/Tribe certificate issued by the competent Authority. The petitioners belong Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. In the Tribe certificate issued in favour of the petitioners by the competent authority the spelling of the tribe is recorded as "Koli Mahadeo"

instead of "Koli Mahadev". The spelling mistake occurred in recording the name of the tribe has persuaded the scrutiny committee to direct the cancellation of tribe certificate. The scrutiny committee has granted liberty to the petitioners to secure proper certificate from the competent authority and produce the same for verification.

3. Issue raised in the instant matter is no more res-integra and is covered by the decision rendered in ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 ::: ( 17 ) wp10221.17 writ petition No.6263 of 2017 and other companion matters. For the reasons recorded in the judgment referred to above, the instant petitions also deserve to be allowed and the same are accordingly allowed.

4. The orders impugned in these petitions stands quashed and set aside. The Scrutiny Committee is directed to return the original Tribe Certificate produced by the petitioners before it, within four weeks from today. The petitioners shall tender an undertaking to the Scrutiny Committee that they would approach the concerned competent authority for ratifying the spelling mistake occurred in recording name of the Tribe and shall produce corrected certificate within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the original certificate. The petitioner shall approach the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer for recording corrections in the Tribe certificates already issued to them. The concerned sub- Divisional Officers, without embarking upon further enquiry into matter, on the basis of Tribe certificate ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 ::: ( 18 ) wp10221.17 issued to each of the individual petitioners by the competent authority earlier shall issue the corrected Tribe Certificate within a period of four weeks from the date of tender an application by the petitioners. On receipt of the corrected certificates, same shall be produced before the Scrutiny Committee within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt. The Scrutiny Committee shall thereafter proceed to decide the claim of the petitioners for validation of Tribe Certificate and render decision on the proposals within a period of six months from the date of receipt of corrected certificates together with the proposals. It would be open for the petitioners to tender the corrected certificate and the proposal if any, directly to the Scrutiny Committee and the Scrutiny Committee shall entertain the same.

5. Rule is made absolute accordingly in above terms. There shall be no order as to costs. ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::

( 19 ) wp10221.17

6. In the meanwhile, no coercive action be taken against the petitioners merely on the ground of invalidation of the Tribe certificate on technical ground.

       [S.M. GAVHANE, J.]                        [R.M. BORDE, J.]

VishalK/wp10221.17 




      ::: Uploaded on - 01/09/2017              ::: Downloaded on - 02/09/2017 01:50:07 :::