Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Aquapump Industries vs Vinod Kumar Rachodmal Rathod on 23 June, 2025

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                                      C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 23.06.2025

                                                           CORAM

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                          C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024


                     1.Aquapump Industries
                       Tudiyalur Post,
                       Coimbatore 641 034
                       and also at
                       No.276/184, Linghi Chetty Street,
                       George Town,
                       Chennai 600 001
                       Rep by its Managing Partner
                       Mr.Ramaswamy Kumaravelu

                     2.Aquasub Engineering
                       Tudiyalur Post,
                       Coimbatore 641 034
                       and also at
                       No.276/184, Linghi Chetty Street,
                       George Town,
                       Chennai 600 001
                       Rep by its Managing Partner
                       Mr.Ramaswamy Kumaravelu                                                      ... Plaintiffs

                                                              -vs-


                     Vinod Kumar Rachodmal Rathod
                     Laxmi Nivas, Near Eshwar Temple,
                     CBT Killa, Hubli,

                     1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am )
                                                                                            C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024

                     Dhurwad, Karnataka 580 020.                                                        ... Defendant

                     PRAYER: Civil Suit (Commercial Division) filed under Order Iv Rule 1 of

                     O.S.Rules and Order VII Rule 1 of the CPC Read With Sections 27, 134 &

                     135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, praying to grant a judgment and decree

                     on the following terms:-

                                  (a) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the defendant, by

                     itself, their servants, agents, distributors, or any one claiming through them

                     from manufacturing, selling, advertising and offering for sale using the

                     Trade Marks 'PRIDE TEXMO', 'MP TEXMO' & 'BLH TEXMO' as such or

                     prefix or suffix in any Pumps or Motors or any related goods And Parts

                     included in Class 7 or in any UPS, CVT, Inverter, Battery, Voltage

                     Stabilizers, Stabilizer Transformer, Wire And Cables, Electrical Conduit,

                     Switch & Switches Accessories, Electrical Switch Board, Socket, Electrical

                     Capacitors, Condensers (Capacitor), Electronic Connectors, Switchgears,

                     Electrical Connectors, Multi-Plugs, MCB Box, Distribution Box, Electric

                     Control Panels And Electrical Sockets included in Class 9 or in any Electric

                     lighting or heating apparatus or related goods and parts included in Class 11

                     or in any other goods manufactured and sold by the Defendant or its trading



                     2/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am )
                                                                                            C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024

                     style or in any media and use the same in invoices, letter heads and visiting

                     cards or by using any other trade mark which is in any way visually, or

                     phonetically identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' registered

                     Trade Mark TEXMO or in any manner infringing the Plaintiffs Registered

                     Trade Mark Nos. 315049 (SP-I), (SP-II) & 315050 (SP-I), (SP-II)

                     renumbered as 2702778, 2702779, 2702780, 2702781, 1961986 & 1961987

                     respectively.

                                  (b) Granting a permanent injunction, restraining the Defendant, by

                     itself, their servants, agents, distributors, or anyone claiming through them

                     from manufacturing, selling, advertising and offering for sale using the

                     Trade Marks 'PRIDE TEXMO', 'MP TEXMO' & 'BLH TEXMO' as such or

                     prefix or suffix in any Pumps or Motors or any related goods And Parts

                     included in Class 7 or in any UPS, CVT, Inverter, Battery, Voltage

                     Stabilizers, Stabilizer Transformer, Wire And Cables, Electrical Conduit,

                     Switch & Switches Accessories, Electrical Switch Board, Socket, Electrical

                     Capacitors, Condensers (Capacitor), Electronic Connectors, Switchgears,

                     Electrical Connectors, Multi-Plugs, MCB Box, Distribution Box, Electric

                     Control Panels And Electrical Sockets included in Class 9 or in any Electric



                     3/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am )
                                                                                              C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024

                     lighting or heating apparatus or related goods and parts included in Class 11

                     or in any other goods manufactured and sold by the Defendant or its trading

                     style or in any media and use the same in invoices, letter heads and visiting

                     cards or by using any other trade mark which is in any way visually, or

                     phonetically identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs' registered

                     Trade Mark TEXMO or in any manner pass off the Plaintiffs' goods.

                                  (c) Directing the Defendant to surrender to the Plaintiffs all the goods,

                     packing materials, cartons, advertisement materials and hoardings,

                     letterheads, visiting cards, office stationery and all other materials containing

                     / bearing the Trade Marks 'PRIDE TEXMO', 'MP TEXMO' & 'BLH

                     TEXMO' or other deceptively similar mark to the Plaintiffs' Trade Mark

                     TEXMO.

                                  (d) Directing the Defendant to render an account of profits made by

                     them by the use of the impugned Trade Marks 'PRIDE TEXMO', 'MP

                     TEXMO' & 'BLH TEXMO' on the goods included in Classes 7, 9 & 11 and

                     decree the suit for the profits found to have been made by the Defendant,

                     after the Defendant has rendered account.




                     4/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                     ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am )
                                                                                             C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024

                                  (e) Directing the Defendant to pay to the Plaintiffs the costs of the

                     suit.



                                  For Plaintiffs       : Ms.Gladys Rosette C.Daniel
                                                         for M/s.C.Daniel

                                  For Defendant        : Ms.N.Devi

                                                               **********

                                                              JUDGMENT

The suit was filed seeking relief in respect of alleged trade mark infringement and passing off. Parties have reached a settlement and recorded the terms thereof in Memorandum of Compromise dated 09.06.2025. The said document has been executed by the Managing Partners of the first and second plaintiffs and by the defendant. The respective counsel have also signed. The memorandum of compromise records that the defendant undertakes to withdraw the applications for registration of the trade marks mentioned in paragraph 4 thereof. It further records that the defendant undertakes not to assert any right in respect of the expression TEXMO or other marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am ) C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024 marks TEXMO, PRIDE TEXMO, MP TEXMO, BLH TEXMO and the following device mark:

2. The defendant has submitted itself to a permanent injunction as per relief claimed in clauses (a) and (b) of paragraph 23 of the plaint. The plaintiff has agreed to relinquish relief claimed in clauses (c), (d) and (e) of paragraph 23 of the plaint. I see no legal impediment to the issuance of a decree in terms of the memorandum of compromise.
3. Therefore, C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024 is decreed in terms of clauses (a) and (b) of paragraph 23 of the plaint. The memorandum of 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am ) C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024 compromise shall form an integral part of the decree. In view of the settlement, there will be no order as to costs.
23.06.2025 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am ) C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.256 of 2024 23.06.2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:08 am )