Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Santosh Ramchandra Waghmare vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 June, 2019

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

                                               1                      914- BA No.1353-19.doc


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                        BAIL APPLICATION NO.1353 OF 2019
                                    WITH
                    CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 835 OF 2019
                                     IN
                      BAIL APPLICATION NO.1353 OF 2019


Santosh Ramchandra Waghmare                        ]        ... Applicant

          Versus

The State of Maharashtra                           ]        ... Respondent

Mr. Abhay Jadhavar, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for State/Respondent.

                                         CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
                                         DATE :- 11 JUNE, 2019.

P. C. :-


1.        The       applicant       is   seeking   bail     in     connection            with

C.R.No.162/2011 registered with Mundhwa Police Station, Pune

u/sec. 436 of I.P.C.



2.        The FIR was lodged by one Vishal Meshram on the allegations

that on 14/11/2011 the present applicant poured petrol on his

motorcycle and burnt it. Due to this act of the applicant, the seat

cover, mudguard cover, chain cover and wiring was burnt and damage
Purti Parab
                                                                                        1 of 3




     ::: Uploaded on - 11/06/2019                      ::: Downloaded on - 12/06/2019 04:19:46 :::
                                         2                     914- BA No.1353-19.doc


to the tune of Rs.10,000/- was caused to the first informant. Based on

these allegations, the offence was registered.



3.        The applicant was not immediately arrested and it is the case of

the prosecution that he was absconding for more than seven years.

Finally, the applicant was arrested on 18/03/2019 and since then he

is in custody.



4.        Heard Mr. Abhay Jadhavar, Advocate for the Applicant and

Mr.S.H. Yadav, APP for State/Respondent.



5.        The allegations in the FIR do not make out any case u/sec. 436

of I.P.C. The act of the applicant has not caused destruction to any

building. At worst Section 435 of I.P.C. can be attracted which is a

bailable offence. In this view of the matter though the applicant was

not available for seven years but since the offence is bailable, he

cannot be kept in jail. Therefore, I am inclined to grant bail to the

applicant. Hence, the following order.




Purti Parab
                                                                                2 of 3




     ::: Uploaded on - 11/06/2019              ::: Downloaded on - 12/06/2019 04:19:46 :::
                                          3                     914- BA No.1353-19.doc


                                    ORDER

1. The Applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R.No.162/2011 registered with Mundhwa Police Station, Pune on his executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

2. The applicant shall attend each and every date before the Trial Court.

3. The applicant shall attend Mundhwa Police Station every alternate Sunday from 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m.

4. Application stands disposed of accordingly.

5. In view of the disposal of bail application, the other application does not survive and is also disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Purti Parab 3 of 3 ::: Uploaded on - 11/06/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 12/06/2019 04:19:46 :::