Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Prem Chand S/O Sh. Mool Chand vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 10 October, 2018

          IN THE COURT OF SURESH KUMAR GUPTA
              ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE­04 
        & SPECIAL JUDGE (NDPS) SOUTH EAST: SAKET
                    COURTS: NEW DELHI

CR No. 718 of 2018
Prem Chand S/o Sh. Mool Chand
R/o H. Block 64, Shiv Durga Vihar
Lakkarpur, Faridabad, Haryana                              .....Appellant.
      Versus
State of NCT of Delhi                               ......Respondent
Instituted on :.06.10.2018 
Argued on    :  08.10.2018
Decided on  :  10.10.2018



JUDGMENT:

1 The   appellant   has   impugned   the   order   dated 25.09.2018 vide which he has been convicted u/s  1853/181 and 66(1)/192 MV Act and admonished for the offence u/s 3/181and 66(1)/192 MV Act but sentenced to undergo SI for three months for the offence u/s 185 MV Act.

2 The   appeal   is   filed   on   the   grounds   that   order   in Prem Chand v. State - CR No. 718 of 2018 1 of 5 question has been passed against the principle of nature justice. The   extreme   punishment   is   inflicted   u/s   185   MV   Act.   The revisionist is driver by profession who is sole bread earner of  his family. A wrong interpretation of plead guilty has been done by Ld. Trial Court. Hence, this revision.

3 The notice of the revision is given to the State. 4 The  facts  of the case are like this. On 23.5.2018 at 11.07   pm   at   Badarpur   Border,   Mathura   Road   revisionist   was driving   Eicher   Canter   bearing   No.   HR­38Q­1591.   He   was intercepted   by   the   traffic   police   officials.   He   was   driving   the vehicle under the influence of liquor. He has failed to produce the driving licence to drive the vehicle. The breath analysis test was conducted. He has consumed 251mg/100ml of alcohol against the permissible limit of 30mg/100ml. He was challaned. 5 He has put his appearance in the court. NOA u/s 251 Prem Chand v. State - CR No. 718 of 2018 2 of 5 CrPC for offence u/s 3/181/185/66(1)/192 MV Act was framed to which   he   pleaded   not   guilty   and   contested   the   case.   The prosecution   has   examined   one   witness.   The   revisionist   has pleaded guilty and accordingly he was convicted and sentenced by making separate entry No. 33 dated 25.9.2018 in the STR.  6 Ld.   Counsel   for   the   revisionist  submitted   that   his revision is only confined to the quantum of sentence passed by ld. Trial Court. He further submitted that Ld. Trial Court has passed the sentence on higher side without giving any reasons for taking such a view. He further submitted that revisionist is 45 years old who is the sole bread earner of his family. He further submitted that a lenient view be taken in favour of the revisionist. 7 Ld. Addl. PP for the State  submitted that Ld. Trial Court   has   rightly   passed   the   sentence   as   persons   driving   the vehicles   under   the   influence   of   liquor   puts   the   lives   of   other persons on the road in danger. 

Prem Chand v. State - CR No. 718 of 2018 3 of 5 8 Heard and perused the record.

9 The   entry   No.   33   dated   25.9.2018   recorded   in summary trial register (STR) is perused. It shows that SI for 3 months has been awarded without showing the offence for which sentence has been awarded whereas order sheet dated 25.9.2018 recorded   in   the   judicial   file   shows   that   revisionist   has   been admonished for the offence u/s 3/181 and 66(1)/192 MV Act. The revisionist is sentenced to undergo SI for 3 months u/s 185 MV Act. 

10 Ld. Trial Court has not given any findings in the STR whether   revisionist   is   convicted   for   one   offence   or   for   all   the offences.   The   Ld.   Trial   Court   has   not   given   any   reason   for awarding the sentence of 3 months u/s185 MV Act. 11 The revision is only qua the point of sentence u/s 185 MV Act. The revisionist has been undergoing sentence since the day   of   passing   of   the   order  i.e.   25.9.2018.   He   is   middle   aged Prem Chand v. State - CR No. 718 of 2018 4 of 5 person   who   has   large   family   to   support.   He   has   undergone sufficient   punishment   for   the   offence   committed   by   him.   The interest of justice shall be met if sentence is modified. Hence, the revisionist is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for the period already undergone by him in this case. 

12 He be released, if not required, in any other case. 13 The revision stands disposed off.

14 Copy of this order be sent to Supdt. Jail, Tihar, New Delhi for compliance.

15  TCR and STR alongwith copy of the order be sent to the Ld. Trial Court.

16 Revision  file be consigned to record room.     announced in the     open court  on                                10th October, 2018 (SURESH KUMAR GUPTA)                            Addl. Sessions Judge­04 & Spl. Judge (NDPS)          South East, Saket Courts,New Delhi   Prem Chand v. State - CR No. 718 of 2018 5 of 5