Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Jharkhand High Court

Dr Rajni Kant Tirkey vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 16 August, 2017

Author: D.N.Patel

Bench: Ratnaker Bhengra, D.N.Patel

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

                                         L.P.A. No. 278 of 2017
                                                         
                Dr. Rajni Kant Tirkey S/o Sri Mahavir Oraon, R/o Veterinary
                College Campus, Kanke, PO & PS Kanke, District Ranchi.
                                                             .......... Appellant
                                                     Versus
                1. The State of Jharkhand
                2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative
                   Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand , Ranchi
                3. The Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Cooperative
                   Department, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Nepal House,
                   PO & PS Doranda,District Ranchi.
                4. The Deputy Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative
                   Reforms and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at
                   Project Building, PO Dhurwa, PS Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi
                5. Sri Vijay Kumar Singh S/o not known to the appellant/petitioner,
                   presently posted as Registrar, Cooperative Society, having its office
                  at Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi ...........    Respondents
 
                                                            ­­­­­­­­­­­
                 CORAM : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
                             : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
                                                             ----------
       For the Appellant                         :          M/S. Neeta Krishna, Advocate
       For the Respondents                       :
                                               ----------
      02/Dated: 16              th
                                     August, 2017

Per D.N.Patel,ACJ

1. Counsel for the appellant, upon instruction from his client, seeks permission to withdraw this application.

2. Permission accorded.

3. This Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

4. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.

       

                            (D.N.Patel,ACJ) (Ratnaker Bhengra, J.) Sharda/Nibha