Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Mallamma W/O Basavanappa vs Veerabhadrappa S/O Belleppa Silli on 5 July, 2013

Author: B.S.Indrakala

Bench: S. Abdul Nazeer, B.S.Indrakala

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

             CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

         DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2013

                            BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

 REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.7329/2011 (PART-POSS)

BETWEEN:

Smt.Mallamma
W/o Basavanappa
Age:46 years
Occ:Agriculture
R/o Banami Village
Tq.Jewargi
Dist.Gulbarga.
                                      ...APPELLANT
(By Sri Sachin M.Mahajan, Adv.)

AND:

1.     Veerabhadrappa
       S/o Belleppa Silli
       Age 66 years
       R/o H.No.9-947/4
       Kailas Nagar
       Gulbarga.

2.     Smt.Lalitabai
       W/o Late Revansiddappa Silli
       Age 41 years
       R/o H.No.11/9
                                2




      Lalgeri, Brahmapur
      Gulbarga.

3.    Smt.Sridevi
      W/o Sharnappa Silli
      Age 39 years
      R/o H.No.9-947/4
      Kailas Nagar
      Gulbarga.

4.    Nandkumar
      S/o Bellappa Silli
      Age 41 years
      R/o H.No.21-115/1
      Dhangar Galli
      Brahmapur
      Gulbarga.

5.    The State of Karnataka
      Through SLAO
      Mini Vidhan Soudha
      Gulbarga.

                                       .... RESPONDENTS

                              ---
      This RSA is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure praying to call for the records and set aside the
judgment and decree dated 2.4.2009 passed by the II Addl. Civil
Judge (Jr.Dn.) at Gulbarga, in O.S.No.353/2007 and the
judgment and decree dated 17.6.2010 passed by the Fast Track
Court-I at Gulbarga in R.A.No.100/2010 and etc.

       This R.S.A. coming on for orders this day, the Court
delivered the following:
                              3




                        JUDGMENT

On 10.10.2012, the appellant was granted a week's time finally to comply with the office objections. This Court observed that if office objections are not complied with, the case be posted for dismissal. Admittedly, the office objections have not been complied with so far. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE.

N