Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Lali T.C vs T.V Ramanathan on 10 November, 2025

Author: C.S.Dias

Bench: C.S.Dias

                                                      2025:KER:85031
CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025

                                  1


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 / 19TH KARTHIKA, 1947

                      CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025

     AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.2288 OF 2015

OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,THRISSUR

PETITIONER:

          LALI T.C
          AGED 52 YEARS
          W/O THAIVALAPPIL BALAN, THANNYAM VILLAGE,
          PERINGOTTUKARA P.O, THRISSUR -, PIN - 680565


          BY ADVS.
          SHRI.ROHIT S.
          SHRI.ANTONY M. GEORGE




RESPONDENT:

          T.V RAMANATHAN,
          AGED 53 YEARS
          S/O VISWANATHAN, KUNNATHUMANA LANE, KOVILAKAM MADAM,
          THRISSUR P.O, THRISSUR-, PIN - 680001



OTHER PRESENT:

          SR PP SRI C S HRITHWIK


     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
10.11.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
                                                        2025:KER:85031
CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025

                                 2


                           ORDER

Dated this the 10th day of November 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C. No.2288/2015 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Thrissur, (Trial Court), which has been filed by the respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881.

2. The petitioner contends that she is a heart patient. She is represented through her counsel. She had participated in the trial and the complaint was posted for judgment. However, by Annexure A3 proceedings dated 31.10.2025, the Trial Court has cancelled the petitioner's bail bond and issued a non-bailable warrant against her, and notice to the sureties. Annexure A3 proceedings is erroneous and irregular and is in flagrant violation of Section 355 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ('BNSS', for short). Hence, Annexure A3 2025:KER:85031 CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025 3 proceedings may be quashed.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner had scrupulously appeared either in person or through her counsel before the Trial Court on all the posting dates. Although the complaint was posted for judgment on 31.10.2025, the petitioner was indisposed. Accordingly, the petitioner's counsel prayed to dispense with the petitioner's personal appearance on the said date. Nevertheless, the Trial Court, by the impugned Annexure A3 proceedings, cancelled the petitioner's bail bond, issued a non-bailable warrant against her and notice to her sureties.

5. It is undisputed that the enquiry and trial in the complaint is completed and the case was posted for judgment. Therefore, Section 355 of the BNSS has no application to the present case. As the complaint was 2025:KER:85031 CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025 4 posted for judgment, the Trial Court directed the petitioner to be personally present. It is also not disputed that the petitioner did not file any application to dispense with her personal appearance on the said date. It was in the said backdrop that the Trial Court passed the impugned proceedings. I do not find any error or illegality in Annexure A3 proceedings.

6. Nonetheless, taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was indisposed due to cardiac problems and that she is prepared to appear before the Trial Court on 12.11.2025, the date of next posting, to meet the ends of justice, I am inclined to exercise the inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS.

Accordingly, I dispose of the Crl.M.C. by setting aside the proceedings dated 31.10.2025,(i) cancelling the bail bond executed by the petitioner,(ii) issuing non-

2025:KER:85031 CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025 5 bailable warrant against her and (iii) issuing notice to the sureties, but subject to the condition that the petitioner appears before the Trial Court on 12.11.2025 to receive the judgment. If the petitioner appears before the Trial Court on the said date, the proceedings dated 31.10.2025 shall stand set aside and quashed. On the contrary, if the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court, Annexure A3 proceedings will stand confirmed.

SD/-

C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rmm10/11/2025 2025:KER:85031 CRL.MC NO. 10098 OF 2025 6 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 10098/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ABSENT PETITION DATED 31ST OF OCTOBER 2025 Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NOTICE DATED 09-07-2025 Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 31ST OF OCTOBER 2025