Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Commissioner Of Cgst And Central Excise ... vs M/S Birla Corporation Limited on 3 October, 2023

Author: B.V. Nagarathna

Bench: B.V. Nagarathna

                                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                     CIVIL APPEAL NO.          OF 2023
                                       (@   Diary No(s).33334/2023)



                         COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
                         JABALPUR (M.P.)                                    APPELLANT(S)


                                                        VERSUS



                          M/S BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED                     RESPONDENT(S)


                                                        O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant submitted that the observations of the Tribunal in paragraph 12 of the impugned final order would become a precedent in subsequent cases as those observations are general in nature and, therefore, would be followed by the Tribunal in other cases.

We do not agree with the said contention of learned ASG for the simple reason that those observations have been made in the context of what has been stated by the Tribunal in paragraph 13 of the impugned final order wherein details of as many as five audits for the relevant periods have been noted by the Tribunal and, therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the said case, the Tribunal held that the Department could not have the benefit of the Signature Not Verified extended period of limitation.

Digitally signed by

Neetu Sachdeva Date: 2023.10.04 15:45:30 IST Reason:

Since, the observations in paragraph 12 are relatable to the contd..

- 2 -

peculiar facts of this case, we think that they cannot be construed to be observations to be applied in general in all cases de hors the facts of the particular cases. With the aforesaid observations, the Civil Appeal is dismissed.

Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.

………………………………………J. [B.V. NAGARATHNA] ……………………………………J. [UJJAL BHUYAN] NEW DELHI OCTOBER 03, 2023 ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.15 SECTION XVII-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 33334/2023 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-03-2023 in EA No. 50799/2021 passed by the Customs Excise Service Tax Appelate Tribunal) COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE JABALPUR (M.P.) Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED Respondent(s) ( IA No.179254/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.179252/2023-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.179251/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ) Date : 03-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Balbir Singh, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. V.C. Bharati, Adv.
Ms. Monica Benjamin, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay condoned.
The Civil Appeal is dismissed in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
(NEETU SACHDEVA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH) (signed order is placed on the file)