Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Tandra Mukherjee & Ors vs Sebi & Ors on 15 January, 2019

                        1


15.01.2019
Item No.95 to 101
Ct. No.238
sdas

                     W.P. 5437 (W) of 2014
                    Tandra Mukherjee & ors.
                              Vs.
                          SEBI & ors.
                             with
                     W.P. 16534 (W) of 2013
                    M/s. Tower Infotech Ltd.
                               Vs.
                           UOI & ors.
                              With
                       C.A.N. 94 of 2017
                              With
                      C.A.N. 8103 of 2017
                              With
                      C.A.N. 8655 of 2017
                              With
                      C.A.N.10159 of 2017
                              With
                      C.A.N.10965 of 2017
                              With
                      C.A.N.12251 of 2017
                              With
                       CAN 6007 of 2018
                              With
                       CAN 7048 of 2018
                              With
                       CAN 7047 of 2018
                              With
                       CAN 7547 of 2018
                              With
                        CAN 67 of 2019
                              With
                     W.P.18229 (W) of 2014
                       Amar Nandy & ors.
                               Vs.
                              SEBI
                              With
                     W.P.21910 (W) of 2017
                      Birendra Nath Koyel
                               Vs.
                          U.O.I. & ors.
                              With
                     W.P.9707 (W) of 2018
                    Snehasish Maity & Anr.
                               Vs.
                      2


                        CBI & Ors.
                          With
                  W.P. 18525(W) of 2018
                    Ashok Das & Ors.
                           Vs.
                     The SEBI & Ors.
                          With
                  W.P. 19275(W) of 2018
                   Asha Poddar & Ors.
                           Vs.
                        UOI & Ors.


Mr. Subir Sayal
                      ...for the petitioner
                      (in W.P.16534 (W) of 2013)

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Subhasish Chakraborty,
Mr. Arindam Das,
Mr. Biswajit Sarkar,
Ms. Rumeli Sarkar,
Mr. Amit Chowudhury,
Ms. Susmita Singh
                  .... for the petitioners
                     (in W.P. 19275(W) of 2018)

Mr. Debabrata Karan,
Ms. Dipanwita Biswas,
Mr. Debopriyo Karan
                  ...for the petitioner
                     (in W.P.21910 (W) of 2017)

Mr. Dibyendu Chatterjee,
Mr. Siddhartha Roy,
Mrs. Madhuporna Kanrar
                   ...for the petitioners
                    (in W.P.5437 (W) of 2014)


Mr. Amitesh Banerjee,
Mr. Tulshi Das Ray,
Mr. Tarak Karan
                    ...for the State



Mr. Tapas Kumar Mukherjee,
Mr. R. N. Duta,
                             3


       Mr. H. K. Halder
                                ..... for the State
                                (in W.P. 5437(W) of 2014
                                            with
                                 in W.P. 16534(W) of 2013)

        Mr. Dipak Kumar Jain
                           ...... for the respondents

(in CAN 7048 of 2018) Mr. A. Chakraborty ..... for the UOI (in W.P. 18229(W) of 2014) Mr. Dilip Kumar Chakraborty ...for the UOI (in W.P.21910 (W) of 2017) Mr. Partha Sarathi Biswas ...for the UOI (in W.P. 5437 (W) of 2014) Ms. Sumitra Das ...for the CBI Mr. H. K. Mitra Mr. Prasanta Kumar Dutt, Mr. Susanta Kumar Dutt, Mr. Syamantak Banerjee ...for the SEBI Mr. Neguive Ahmed ...for the Committee Learned senior Counsel appearing for the State submits the applications from claimants ought to be inventorised by SEBI before they are handed over to the State. 4

Learned senior Counsel appearing for the SEBI submits that due to paucity of manpower such exercise may not be possible.

Under such circumstances, we direct a joint inventory of the applications received from depositors be conducted by SEBI and EOW, Government of West Bengal and report be filed on the next date of hearing. State Government shall render necessary assistance in the matter of manpower to SEBI in that regard, if necessary.

Matter is adjourned for four weeks. (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)