Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt Basavannevva vs The State Of Karnataka By Women Police ... on 10 September, 2008

Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy

Bench: C.R.Kumaraswamy

1.

m_~I;1D_=

1.

V' _;R[ 0:. M.R.B.C.Road., Dandapur,
., Na;--'agxmd. ' "

I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH A'? DHARWAD

DATED THIS 'I'§~IE 10115 DAY OF SEPTEMBEQ' " 

BEFORE
THE HOPPBLE MR.JUsT1c;§ i§.R;K;J';w1A-RAS§J_;31§d?'_ 

cRL.,§>., No.727ii»2é>i}é

BETWEEN :

Smt.BasavanneWa;   *  ' "
Wfo late Magundapph ¥?a,ng;angc1_1d,a£1=, _
Age: 52 years, Occ: Ho_i1se}1o1c1w_ork;»... " -.
R/0: M.F.'.B.(_3.Road,... .f)_a11d'a;3ur, "   ' .. 

Smt. Sizgihéa,' W] 6 ~;}'a.gadish";Be1avatagi,
AgVe:A.;38 "y:3_a1*(§;:;:Qcc~:_ _i"I.ouSe}1okd. work,
 o: M'. R. C. Road,' ' «Danciapur,

. Jagétéiish, S/"<3  Belavatagi,

Age: 45" years, 'e'C)cé;=_: Nil,

. . . Petitioners

A  Sié.  Yeli, Advocate)

"'¥'h$f3t.éte of Kaxnataka,

Byxfifomen Police Hubli Dhanvad City,

x 'T «Rep. by State Public Prosecutor,
_ High Court Building, Dhaiwad.

Smt. Leelavathi,

W] o Sridhar Rangemgtmdar,

Age: 28 years, Occ: I-{ouschom work,
R/o: Plot No.2G2, Manjunatha Nagar,

Gokul Road PS limits, Hubli.  Respondents:

(By Sri P.H.Gotkhindi, HCGP for R. 1)

U



Z

This c::rimiJ3.a3 petition is filed under Section 482
praying to call for the relevant records and ailow this
C  petition by setting aside the order dated 16.__'7.'2008
passed by the learned JMFC § Court, 41112515., in
C.C.No.11?9/2008 (iP.C.No.44/2008) and oonsctguenfly
quash the enfire cxixninal ptmceedings pending....a,gaji:s"gE the

petitioners for the ofienee punishable under Seeziiods §%_i98"{A)',

32:3, 504, see r/W. 34 ofi.P.C.
This cximinal petition  '_ for  
day, the Court made the followixitgi'  .   -  "  

ORDE.'

 

Heard the learned the fiefifionezs as Wei}

as the Government Adffoeaie';   

2. ms   432 Cr.P.C. by
the   tee relevant records and
  aside the order dated
16.7é0Q8  JMFC 13: Court, Hubli, in

c.oe.No.1%:79V]2oo~s %u?.e.'1§o.44/ 2008) and quash the entire

 V'  .  pexjediugvagainst the petitioners for the offences

A    Sections 49394), 323, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of

'' 4I,'P;e. .' 1 * '-

.,  Respondent No.2 had filed 3. complaint before the

" fl4§lV!FC 1" Court, Hubli, for commission of offences

 pdnishable under Sections 49s(a;, 323, 504, see r/W. 34 of

H I.P.C. and the said complaint was registered in

P.C.No.4-4/2008. This oomplaint was filed against the
Q/'



accused Basavarmevva, Sudha and Jaggadish.

Basavannevvaficcused No.1 is the mother--i11.:1are"-jfijfhhhthe

coxnpiainant, Sudha-accused No.2 is the  

Jagadishu-accused No.3 is the huebéiudof     

4. In the complaint it.is4__averr€:d"that at  L.

of accused No.3, accused V2 
against the   vth_e.t,'Vvv;2\Lt.t11e fimetor marriage
and after the   fzrgjvgfihpb/'ieembers of the
coreaplairaant'  not   or regard to the
family   accused persons also
  not treating the accused
 3  used to taunt the complainant
th.Va_1:_v 'v.hei~:{e  money and respect, had if they

  eiiy~--..r..ather family and iikewise, the accused

V  ;us:ed._ to always taunt the complainant and gave

.' . ruentel  anti harassment and demanded gold. The

accueedhv hever used to provide her food and they used to

2 » AA tmemtlessly beat her and in January, the complainant came

  her parentai house. To the shock and smpfise of the

complainant and her mother, all the accused rushed to the

said house and started using filthy language and beating the
comphmant saying that she has separated her husband

from the family and by holding her hair, they kicked, beat
5/



mercilessly, used filthy language and also accused No.2 told.
to the mother of the complainant as to what she has taught
her daughter and likewise, all the accused createdV--ar1 ugly

SCCLIC.

5. After lodging of the core.pla;':a--t,-- ._   

Magistrate has referred the matter:.toA }'tl1'e» at tithe l

Police have investigated the .4casel"'a;ld after of.

investigation, the Police  a charge:_VVsh.eetl:'against the
petitioners.  R   ll

6. The contentefleof that the
colnplainant" g.'.~g.;o    23.4.2000. After the
 " 1    with her mother-in-law,
$ister¥inl~laW  of sister-in--law. They
ha1vaeseclher"to iget amount and gold ornaments. They

 ahused  that the core.p§ainaht's father has

V  gold ornaments. Since the husbané. of

l' the  had got empioyment in government, on

w¢e1;-'e:;d§ he used to visit the house. After he going, the

2 V. x complainant was not given food and the mother-indaw and

ttlaislter-in~law used to scold her. They were also harassing

"her to bring bicycle. 011 6.1.2008 at about 7.30 p.111. accused

Nos.1 to 3 came in a van to the parental house of the

E/'



complainant and abused her saying that she had segmated

her son and accused No.3 tokd her to ask her  to

five Rs.3.00 lakhs to him or else she should  

and they also told her to rea1ise_Jthe__mone3,?'   . 1 

amount and handover the samewto file" accused.  Efiso

kicked her. Thereby they have co1h1nitted'VVo£3"eficeasit'

punishable under Sections  -323, W. 34 of
mic. V .. A  
7. The leaxned ACo1:.1_n.seiV._   vjeeifitioners submitted

that there     "het"*e:en the husband of

  Therefore, this complaint
is   filed in order to dilute the civil

iitigatio1V:i.e..__dd ._ _ 
  In case, the compiainant has filed the

 .,  ~,'_I'he hrhresfigafing agency has laid the charge

   ddétverments contaiued in the complaint and also

the  sheet Ieveais that there are aiiegations against

 the i;e,_tifioners in connection with dowry harassment and

  The ailegatiozxs made in the comgplaint do constitute

"the ofiences alleged against the petitioners.

Q'/'



9. It is the contexation of the learned _._for the

pefifioners that since there is civil litigation, t}1is.«"--1;y.as

to be quashed. There is no hair for seeking the 

civil and criminal law, on the sam_e.fa(_:1f,s.  H  ' 

10. The power to quas}1 "¥¢:Vhe'_'_A  
should be exercised very  2  51'  L'
case. In the instant cese,   accused,
that is petitioner  .   the ofience alleged
against them. This ca'5e*v.e1{§es   the category of

rarest of     eicebfifit all these aspects,

this c;ti3a:3ina1 petiticnwis'  the same is
liable to be dismissecl. V V' %

1 1. TheV'eheer§e.tieI1s"1ma.£ie hemm shaii not influence

the 'a. E  "decidinghflie matter on merits. In case if

. the   for discharge, the same s3:1a1l

 §Le*~V£iiespose€i._cVtA"  court in accordance with law.

 Ere  of the above diseussinn, I pass the

ORDER

%'ac""i1escmdnunazpeuuoniscfismssed.

sa/-;

Judge