Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sections 498A/302/304B/328/34 Of The ... vs In Re : Pintu Das & Ors on 4 March, 2024

04.03.2024
   25
 sdas
allowed
                                  CRM(DB) No. 587 of 2024

                   In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the
             Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nakashipara
             Police Station Case No. 887 of 2023 dated 17.10.2023 under
             Sections 498A/302/304B/328/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
                                              And
                   In Re : Pintu Das & Ors.    ...... petitioners


                   Mr. Kusal Kumar Mukherjee
                   Mr. Narattam Acharyya
                                          ....for the petitioners

                   Mr. Neguive Ahamed, learned APP
                   Mr. Amanul Islam
                                            .... for the State



                   1.

Petitioner no. 1 is the husband of the victim lady.

Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are her parents-in-law. Petitioners are in custody for 133 days. It is submitted that victim lady and her father consumed poison at her parental home. Petitioners have been falsely implicated. They pray for bail.

2. Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and contends petitioners had given medicine to the victim and her father. They returned home and consumed medicine. They fell ill and died.

3. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioners are the husband and parents-in-law of the victim lady. Prior to the incident victim returned to her parental home with her father. It is alleged a bottle of medicine had been handed over to them by the petitioners. They consumed the medicine two days after the 2 victim returned to her parental home. Credibility of the allegation of supply of medicine by the in-laws require to be assessed in the light of the aforesaid facts during trial. Investigation is in progress. There is no chance of abscondence. Accordingly, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

4. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadia at Krishnanagar, subject to condition that petitioners shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

5. In the event petitioners fail to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

6. The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)                     (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)