Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sri Debaprasad Halder vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 16 August, 2016

Author: Joymalya Bagchi

Bench: Joymalya Bagchi

                                       1


                  IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi


                               W.P. 13902 (W) of 2016


                               Sri Debaprasad Halder
                                         Vs.
                           The State of West Bengal & Ors.




       For the petitioners : Mr. Ganesh Srivastava,
                             Mr. Prabir Chatterjee


       For the State :          Mr. Sabir Ahmed,
                                Mr. Pritheeraj Sen



Heard on :   16.08.2016


Judgement on: 16.08.2016


Joymalya Bagchi, J. :-



       The petitioner is a victim of acid attack and had suffered loss

of sight in one eye.         He was also required to undergo medical

treatment including surgical procedure for repair of the wounds

suffered by him.

       It has been argued on behalf of the State that the petitioner

is entitled to get compensation of Rs.50,000/- in view of the
                                    2


schedule appended to the Victim Compensation Scheme notified on

1st November, 2012.

      Relying on the Apex Court's decision in the case of Laxmi vs.

Union of India & Ors. (2014) 4 SCC 431, Mr. Srivastava, learned

Counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that compensation

payable to a victim of acid attack cannot be less than of

Rs.3,00,000/-.

      I have considered the submissions of the learned Counsel

appearing for both the parties.        Admittedly the petitioner had

suffered loss of sight in one eye as well as other extensive injuries

due to acid attack.    Criminal proceeding is pending in respect of

such attack upon the petitioner.

      Question which falls for decision in this writ petition      is

whether the petitioner is entitled to get compensation under the

Victim Compensation Scheme under Section 357A of the Code of

Criminal Procedure and, if so, to what extent.

      With regard to the entitlement of the petitioner there is no

dispute in as much as he is a victim of acid attack. However, it is

contended that in the light of the scheme and the schedule

appended thereto the petitioner is entitled to get a sum of

Rs.50,000/- only.     On the other hand, reliance is placed on Laxmi

vs. Union of India & Ors.(supra) and an unreported decision of

this Court in W.P. No. 34704(W) of 2013 (Sabana Khatun vs. The
                                  3


State of West Bengal & Ors.) to argue that petitioner is entitled to

compensation to the tune of at least Rs.3,00,000/-.

       In Laxmi vs. Union of India & Ors.(supra) the Apex Court is

held as follows :

      "13. We are informed that pursuant to this provision, 17
      States and 7 Union Territories have prepared 'Victim
      Compensation Scheme'(for short 'the Scheme'). As regards
      the victims of acid attacks, the compensation mentioned in
      the Scheme framed by these States and Union Territories is
      un-uniformed. While the State of Bihar has provided for
      compensation of Rs.25,000 in such Scheme, the State of
      Rajasthan has provided for Rs.2 lakhs of compensation. In
      our view, the compensation provided in the Scheme by most
      of the States/Union Territories is inadequate. It cannot be
      overlooked that acid attack victims need to undergo a series
      of plastic surgeries and other corrective treatments. Having
      regard to this problem, the learned Solicitor General
      suggested to us that the compensation by the States/Union
      Territories for acid attack victims must be enhanced to at
      least Rs 3 lakhs as the aftercare and rehabilitation cost. The
      suggestion of the learned Solicitor General is very fair.


      14. We, accordingly, direct that the acid attack victims shall
      be paid compensation of at least Rs.3 lakhs by the State
      Government/Union Territory concerned as the aftercare and
      rehabilitation cost. Of this amount, a sum of Rs.1 lakh shall
      be paid to such victim within 15 days of occurrence of such
      incident (or being brought to the notice of the State
      Government/Union of Territory) to facilitate immediate
      medical attention and expenses in this regard. The balance
      sum of Rs.2 lakhs shall be paid as expeditiously as may be
      possible and positively within two months thereafter. The
      Chief Secretaries of the States and the Administrators of the
      Union Territories shall ensure compliance with the above
      direction."

      The ratio in the aforesaid authority was quoted with approval

by another learned Single Judge of this Court of W.P. No. 34704(W)

of 2013 wherein it was held that a victim of acid attack is entitled
                                     4


to a higher compensation in terms of the ratio laid down by the

Apex Court and not the schedule appended to the Scheme framed

by the State of West Bengal. It appears from the said report that

the Apex Curt had fixed a minimum amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to an

acid attack victim. It is, therefore, open to the State respondents to

frame a Victim Compensation Scheme of varying amounts of compensation depending on the degree of injuries including loss of life suffered by the victim, however, the minimum amount of compensation cannot be fixed below Rs.3,00,000/-.

Under such circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition directing the respondent authorities more particularly, the Chief Secretary of the State of West Bengal to pay a total sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the writ petitioner, an acid attack victim, and out of the said amount a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- be paid within fifteen days from the date of communication of this order and thereafter the balance amount be paid within two months thereafter as prescribed by the Apex Court in its order passed in connection with Laxmi vs. Union of India & Ors. (supra). In the event the payment schedule is not adhered to by the respondent authorities the amount shall carry interest of 15 per cent per annum from the date of accrual of liability till the date of payment.

There shall be no order as to costs.

5

Let photostat plain copy of this order, duly countersigned by Assistant Registrar (Court), be given to the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties on usual undertaking.

(Joymalya Bagchi, J.)