Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation ... vs B. Ramkumar Adityan on 27 July, 2020

Bench: Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy, M.R. Shah

     ITEM NO.20          Court 5 (Video Conferencing)            SECTION XII

                         S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 11184/2020

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-05-2020
     in WMP No. 8928/2020 and WMP No. 8929/2020 passed by the High Court
     Of Judicature At Madras)

     TAMIL NADU STATE
     MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ETC.                       Petitioner(s)

                                           VERSUS

     B. RAMKUMAR ADITYAN & ANR. ETC.                Respondent(s)
     ( IA No. 50408/2020 – INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.
     63471/2020      -      PERMISSION TO     FILE     ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
     WITH
     Diary No(s). 11185/2020 (XII)

     Diary No(s). 11278/2020 (XII)

     Date : 27-07-2020       These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

     For Petitioner(s)       Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AAG
                             Pallavi Sengupta, Adv.
                             Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR

     For Respondent(s)       Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR

                             Ikshit Singhal, Adv.
                             Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
                             Mr. Amit, Adv.
                             Mr. Mohit Kaushik, Adv.
                             Mr. Vipin Sandhu, Adv.
                             Vani Vyas, Adv.
                             For M/S. Mukesh Kumar Singh And Co.

                             Mr.   G. Ananda Selvam, Advocate
                             Mr.   V. Vasantha Kumar, Adv.
                             Ms.   Sujatha Bagadhi, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                             Mr.   H. Chandra Sekhar, AOR
Digitally signed by
MEENAKSHI KOHLI
Date: 2020.07.27
16:25:33 IST
Reason:                      Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, AOR



                                            1
                       Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR

                        Caveator-in-person

                       Mr. G. Sivabalamurugan, AOR

                       Mr.   K. K. Mani, AOR
                       Mr.   Karthik Raja K.S., Adv.
                       Mr.   M. Sundara Kadeswaran, Adv.
                       Ms.   T. Archana, Adv.

                       Mr. P.V.S. Giridhar, Adv.
                       Mrs. Kavitha Y., Adv.
                       Mr. Jimraj Milton, Adv.
                       Mr. T. S. Sabarish, AOR

                       Mr.   S. Prabakaran, Sr. Adv.
                       Ms.   G. Chitrakala, Adv.
                       Mr.   Amit Arora, Adv.
                       Mr.   Mohd. Asif Ali, Adv.
                       Ms.   Divya, Adv.
                       Mr.   Ashish Upadhyaya, Adv.
                       Mr.   Yusuf, AOR

                       Mr. Anirudh Krishnan, Advocate
                       Mr. Adarsh Subramaniam, Advocate
                       Mr. Shiva Krishnamurthi, Advocate
                       Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR

                       Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR

                       Mr. Anish R. Shah, AOR

                       Ms. Lakshmi Ramamurthy, AOR

                       Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv.
                       Ms. Anupradha Singh, Adv.
                       Mr. Satya Mitra, AOR

                       Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, Advocate on Record
                       Mr. Reginald Valsalan, Advocate

            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

                                  O R D E R

Impleadment / Intervention application is rejected. These special leave petitions have been filed against the interim orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in 2 W.M.P. Nos. 8928/2020 in 7578 of 2020 and W.M.P. No. 8929/2020 in W.P. No. 7589 of 2020.

By the impugned order, various directions were issued with regard to sale of liquor in the State of Tamil Nadu.

This Court passed an interim order staying the interim orders of the High Court by order dated 15.05.2020.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petitions are being heard by the High Court and the interim orders passed by this Court may be allowed to continue till the disposal of the writ petitions.

Mr. Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the relief claimed in the writ petitions has virtually become infructuous.

We are of the view that the writ petitions which are being heard may be decided by the High Court. The interim protection granted by this Court on 15 th May, 2020 shall continue till disposal of the writ petitions.

With the aforesaid view, the special leave petitions are disposed of.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

(MEENAKSHI KOHLI)                                                (RENU KAPOOR)
   AR-CUM-PS                                                      COURT MASTER




                                         3