Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Bombay High Court

Madhu Tatya Shinde vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 26 August, 2021

Author: R. G. Avachat

Bench: R. G. Avachat

                                               1              943-ca-7932-2015.doc



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7932 OF 2015
                                      IN
                    FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 21118 OF 2014

 Madhu Tatya Shinde                             ... Applicant
        Versus
 The State of Maharashtra and another           ... Respondents
                                     ....
 Mr. J. R. Patil, Advocate for applicant
 Mr. A. B. Chate, AGP for respondent No.1
 Mr. G. B. Rajale, Advocate for respondent No.2
                                     ....

                                         CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 26th AUGUST, 2021 PER COURT :-

. Heard.

2. For the reasons given in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B", provided that the applicant shall not be entitled for interest for the delayed period of 1037 days.

3. Appeal be registered.

4. On registration of appeal, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 18th November, 2021.

1 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 27/08/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2021 06:13:04 ::: 2 943-ca-7932-2015.doc

5. Learned AGP waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and Shri G. B. Rajale, learned Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.2.

6. Call record and proceedings.

[ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] SMS 2 of 2 ::: Uploaded on - 27/08/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 28/08/2021 06:13:04 :::