Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 6]

Kerala High Court

Jith & Others vs State Of Kerala on 1 April, 2011

Author: V.Ramkumar

Bench: V.Ramkumar

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2441 of 2011()



1. JITH & OTHERS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :01/04/2011

 O R D E R
                          V. RAMKUMAR, J.
                        .........................................
                         B.A. No. 2441 of 2011
                       ..........................................

                            Dated: 01-04-2011

                                     ORDER

Petitioners who are the accused in Crime No. 432 of 2011 of Irinjalakkuda Police Station, Thrissur District for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 448, 294 (b), 506 (i) and 353 read with Sec. 149 I.P.C. seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. After evaluating the factors and parameters which are to be taken into consideration under paragraph 122 of the verdict of the Apex Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra and Others (2010 (4) KLT 930), I am of the view that anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature, since the investigating officer has not had the advantage of interrogating the petitioners. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail allowed by the Magistrate or the Court having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the investigating officer on 11-04-2011 or on 12-04-2011 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. In case the investigating B.A.No. 2441 of 2011 -:2:- officer is of the view that having regard to the facts of the case arrest of the petitioners is imperative he shall record his reasons for the arrest in the case diary as insisted in paragraph 129 of Siddharam's case (supra). The petitioners shall thereafter be produced before the Magistrate or the Court concerned and permitted to file an application for regular bail. In case the interrogation of the petitioners is without arresting them, the petitioners shall thereafter appear before the Magistrate or the Court concerned on the same day or on the next day and apply for regular bail. The Magistrate or the Court on being satisfied that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police shall, after hearing the prosecution as well, release the petitioners on bail.

4. In case the petitioners while surrendering before the Investigating Officer have deprived the investigating officer sufficient time for interrogation, the officer shall complete the interrogation even if it is beyond the time limit fixed as above and submit a report to that effect to the Magistrate or the Court concerned. Likewise, the Magistrate or the Court also will not be bound by the time limit fixed as above if sufficient time was not available after the production or appearance of the petitioners .

5. The release of the petitioners shall be on each of the petitioners executing a bond for `. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and subject to the following conditions:-

1. The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays till the filing of the final report.
B.A.No. 2441 of 2011 -:3:-
2. The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who is acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing any information to the Court or to the police or to any other person in authority.
3. The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the police at any time till the filing of the final report.
4. The petitioners shall not establish any contact with any of the witnesses or accused in the case.
5. The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses or the victims nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.
6. The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.
7. The petitioners shall notify to the Court their place of residence before executing the bail bond.

This petition is disposed of as above.

Dated this the Ist day of April, 2011.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE ani/