Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Bank Of India vs N.Radhakrishnan on 29 June, 1996

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALAAT ERNAKULAM

                                             PRESENT:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
                                                   &
                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD

                   FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2016/21ST PHALGUNA, 1937

                                       AS.No. 845 of 1997 (E)
                                         -----------------------
    AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS NO. 758/1993 of II ADDITIONAL SUB
                                COURT, KOZHIKODE DATED 29.06.1996

APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
------------------------

          BANK OF INDIA, BEYPORE BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY REGIONAL
          MANAGER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI.NITHYANANDA DAS.

            BY ADVS.SRI.MPR.NAIR
                         SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

RESPONDENT(S)/DEFENDANTS:
----------------------------

          1.         N.RADHAKRISHNAN, S/O.CHOYIKUTTY,
                     NARANGA PARAMBATH HOUSE, (P.O)BEYPORE,
                     BEYPORE AMSOM DESOM IN KOZHIKODE TALUK.

          2.         T.S.SARALA, W/O.SUBRAMANIAN, THOTTUNGAL HOUSE,
                     BEYPORE AMSOM DESOM OF KOZHIKODE TALUK.

            R2 BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.SOHAN
                              SRI.K.RAJEEV
                              SRI.B.PREMNATH

            THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-03-2016, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



                ANTONY DOMINIC & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.
                       --------------------------------------
                            A.S.No.845 of 1997
                       --------------------------------------
                Dated this the 11th day of March, 2016

                                 JUDGMENT

Antony Dominic, J.

When this appeal of the year 1997 was called, there was no representation for the appellant. Appellant is also absent. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks 2 ANTONY DOMINIC & A.HARIPRASAD, JJ.

A.S.No.845 of 1997

JUDGMENT 11th March, 2016