Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Gujarat High Court

Shrimant Sangramsinh Pratpsinhrao ... vs Mrunalinidevi Puar & on 24 February, 2014

Author: R.D.Kothari

Bench: R.D.Kothari

         C/SCA/4632/2006                                ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4632 of 2006


                                 With
                   CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3423 of 2009
                                   In
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4632 of 2006
================================================================
       SHRIMANT SANGRAMSINH PRATPSINHRAO GAEKWAD &
                       1....Petitioner(s)
                            Versus
            MRUNALINIDEVI PUAR & 10....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR AMAR N BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 - 2
DECESED LITIGANT, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 5
MR PARTHIV B SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2 - 2.3 , 3
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 4 , 6
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 7
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.D.KOTHARI

                            Date : 24/02/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

Learned   advocate   Mr.   Amar   Bhatt   for   the  petitioners   submits   that   the   present   petition  arises out of an interim order passed in Regular  Civil Suit No. 640/2003. 

Mr. Bhatt produces a letter received by him  from the petitioners and submits that in view of  the consent terms arrived at between the parties  Page 1 of 2 C/SCA/4632/2006 ORDER in   the   Civil   Suit   before   the   trial   Court,   the  petitioners  do not  wish to  proceed  further   with  the   petition   and   the   civil   application.   Learned  advocate   Mr.Bhatt   submits   that   in   view   of   the  aforesaid   development,   this   petition   has   become  infructuous. The aforesaid letter dated 31.1.2014  received by Mr. Bhatt from his client is taken on  record.

In   view   of   the   above   development,   this  petition   as   well   as   civil   application   stand  disposed  of as  having  become  infructuous.     Rule  is discharged. No costs.

(R.D.KOTHARI, J.) Patel Page 2 of 2