Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Parle Products Private Limited vs Parle Agro Pvt Ltd on 6 April, 2021

Author: K.R.Shriram

Bench: K.R.Shriram

                                        1/2                             31.COMIP-10-2007.doc




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                          IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                        COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.10 OF 2007
                                      WITH
                     INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.2801 OF 2021
                                       IN
                        COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.10 OF 2007

Parle Products Private Limited           ....Plaintiff
          V/s.
Parle Agro Private Limited           ....Defendant
                                   WITH
                  COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.27 OF 2009
                                    IN
              INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.2797 OF 2021
                                    IN
                  COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.27 OF 2009
                                    ----
Mr. Avinash Belge a/w. Mr. Nishini Shrikhande and Mr. Aditya Chitale i/b. R
K Dewan Legal Services LLP for plaintiff.
Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w. Mr. Nishad Nadkarni and Ms. Khushboo
Jhunjhunwala i/b. Khaitan and Co. for defendant.
                                    ----
                                     CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATED : 6th APRIL 2021 P.C. :

1 Cross examination of PW-2 is still in process. Mr. Kamod states that it will be concluded by 30th April 2021.
2 The Commissioner to endeavor to complete recording of evidence of PW-2 by 30th April 2021. The Commissioner to fix minimum two/three dates per session for cross examination of PW-2. If the parties do not respond promptly within 48 hours of receiving a communication from the Commissioner suggesting the subsequent dates, the Commissioner to go ahead and fix the dates convenient to the Commissioner and the parties Gauri Gaekwad ::: Uploaded on - 06/04/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/09/2021 12:14:33 ::: 2/2 31.COMIP-10-2007.doc shall make themselves available at the time and dates fixed by the Commissioner. If plaintiff or the witness does not remain present, the Commissioner should close the evidence of PW-2 as not made available for cross and if defendant does not remain present to cross examine the witness, defendant's cross examination should be treated closed as no cross.

Once the dates are fixed, the Commissioner not to grant adjournment on any ground whatsoever.

3 Mr. Belge states that the evidence affidavit of plaintiff's 3 rd and last witness shall be affirmed and copy served by 4th May 2021. 4 Stand over to 6th May 2021 for marking of documents/ recording of evidence on which date plaintiff's 3 rd witness shall remain present in Court.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad ::: Uploaded on - 06/04/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 05/09/2021 12:14:33 :::