Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Union Of India vs Nithin Venkatesh on 16 January, 2014

Bench: S.Abdul Nazeer, H.S.Kempanna

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

         DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014

                           PRESENT

        THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

                              AND

            THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.KEMPANNA


             WRIT APPEAL NOs.5156-5159 OF 2009
                               &
            WRIT APPEAL NOs.1059-1063 OF 2010 A/W
                MISC.W.NO.3805/2010 (GM-RES))



Between :

Union of India
Department of Petroleum and Natural Gas
Shastri Bhavan
New Delhi
Represented by its Secretary

                                            ...Appellant
                                             (common)

(By Sri S.Kalyan Basavaraj, ASG)
                                    2




And :

1.      Sri. Nithin Venkatesh
        S/o. K. Venkatesh
        Aged about 33 years
        No.127, N Block
        1st stage, 1st Cross
        Adhichunchanagiri road
        Kuvempunagar
        Mysore - 560 023


2.      Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,
        Bangalore Division
        No.29, P.Kalinga Rao Road
        Bangalore - 560 027
        Represented by its Chief
        Divisional Retail Sales Manager
        Sri. Samson Chacko


3.      IBP Company Limited
        Head Office, Mumbai
        By its Deputy General Manager
        (Marketing)


4.      IBP Company Limited
        IBP House, 34-A,
        Nirmal Chandra Street
        Kolkatta - 700 013
        By its Managing Director



5.      The General Manager (South Region)
                                3




     IBP Company Limited
     10, Mayor V.R.Ramanathan Road
     Chetput, Chennai - 600 031


6.   Sri. Y.T.Narendra Babu
     S/o. Thammaiah
     Aged about 55 years
     No.3, Yelemane 1st Main
     1st stage, 1st cross
     Rajajinagar
     Bangalore - 560 010


7.   IBP Company Limited
     IBP House, 34-A,
     Nirmal Chandra Street
     Kolkatta - 700 013
     By its Deputy General Manager
     (R-4 in WP.No.1016/2007)
     14528/2007 & R-9 in 1058/2007


8.   Sri. H.H Shivakumar
     S/o. late Huche Gowda
     Aged about 47 years
     Shalini Nilaya, Keshava Road
     Behind Govt. Polytechnic College
     Indiranagar, Hassan - 573 201

9.   Smt. B.V.Anasuyamma
     W/o. late B. Venugopal Gupta
     Aged about 72 years
     Ankitha Nilaya
     Somagudi Road
     Challakere
                                   4




      Chitradurga District - 577 522



10.   Smt. C.A. Sudha
      W/o. C.B.Ashwin
      Aged about 43 years
      R/o. No.1066, 1st Cross
      Gange Road, G & H Block
      Kuvempunagar
      Mysore - 570 009

11.   Sri. Arun G. Topannawar
      Aged about 42 years
      Club Road, Basav Nagar
      Belgaum

12.   Sri. Nitin S. Angadi
      Aged about 31 years
      Residing at 7th Cross
      Bhagyanagar, Belgaum

13.   Sri. C.S.Puttaraju
      S/o. Sanna Thamme Gowda
      Aged about 45 years
      R/o. Chinna Kurli Village
      Chinnakurli Hobli
      Padavapura Taluk
      Mandya District

14.   Sri. N.Seetharama Shetty
      S/o. late Sanjeeva Shetty
      Aged about 56 years
      R/at. 'Sri Devi Prasad'
      Dads Asaigoli, Kanaje Village
      Mangalore Taluk
                                    5




       Dakshina Kannada                            ...Respondents
                                                      (Common)

(By Sri G.A.Srikante Gowda, Adv., for Respondent Nos.1, 8, 9, 10 and
R6 and 11 and 14: Sri. R.Gopal Krishna, Adv., for Respondent No.2
to 5 and 7)


       These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka
High Court Act, praying to set aside the order passed in the writ
petition No.6836/2007, 1016/2007, 1058/2007 and 14528/2007
dated 28.07.2009 etc.

      Misc.W.No.3805/2010 is filed under Section 151 r/w Article
226 and 227 of Indian Constitution of India.

       These Writ Appeals along with Misc.W., coming on for Orders
this day, S.ABDUL NAZEER. J., delivered the following:


                            JUDGMENT
       The       private    respondents       in     these      writ

appeals      filed    W.P.No.6836/2007     and other connected

matters seeking a writ of mandamus or any                     other

appropriate order or direction directing the other respondents to consider their applications or their nominees for issue of regular dealership/ and appoint their nominees as dealers.

They           have         also         sought                  for
                                        6




quashing             the         letter           dated         06.09.2006

bearing                    No.P-19011/1/2004-IOC issued by Union

of India and also another letter dated 13.10.2006 bearing No. JRO/COCO (No.155/06-07) issued by IBP Company limited. The learned Single Judge has clubbed all the writ petitions and allowed them by order dated 28.07.2009. The present appeals are directed against the said order of the learned Single Judge.

2. One of the writ petitions in W.P.No.1016/2007 filed by Y.T.Narendra Babu, seeking an identical relief was also allowed by the learned Single Judge. A common order was passed in all these cases. Indian Oil Corporation challenged the said order by filing Writ Appeal No.3248/2009 before the Division Bench of this Court. The Division Bench by order dated 19.11.2009 dismissed the said appeal and confirmed the order of the learned Single Judge. Feeling aggrieved, the Indian Oil 7 Corporation filed SLP (SLP (C) No.9655/2010) which was later converted into C.A.No.5259/2013. The Apex Court by order dated 16.07.2013 has allowed the Civil Appeal and has set aside the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court and also the order of the learned Single Judge.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

4. The point in issue in these writ appeals is covered by the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.A.No.5288/2013 dated 08.07.2013 connected with C.A.No.5259/2013 dated 16.07.2013. The contention of Sri. Srikantegowda, learned counsel for the private respondents is that the decision of the Apex Court in the above Civil Appeal is distinguishable and has no application to the facts is without any merit. Therefore, these writ appeals are also allowed and the orders of the learned Single Judge impugned herein are set aside subject to the observations made by the Apex Court in the aforesaid Civil Appeals. 8

In view of the disposal of these writ appeals as above, Misc.W.No.3805/2010 does not survive for consideration. It is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE.

Sd/-

JUDGE.

HJ*