Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Smt.Reena And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 15 February, 2012

Author: Mehinder Singh Sullar

Bench: Mehinder Singh Sullar

CRM No.M-4501 of 2012                                          1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                              CRM No.M-4501 of 2012

                                              Date of Decision:15.02.2012

Smt.Reena and another                                                ......Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others                                          .....Respondents


CORAM:        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR.


Present:      Mr.Harender Singh, Advocate,
              for the petitioners.

              ****

MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR, J.(oral) Heard.

Issue notice of motion.

At this stage, Mr.Jasdev Singh Brar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notices on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 3 and 5 and Mr.Charanjit Singh Bakhshi, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notices on behalf of respondent Nos.2, 4 and 6, respectively.

The petitioners claiming themselves to be major, submitted that they have performed their marriage against the wishes of the parents. They apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos.7 to 12.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the record and without commenting and expressing any opinion with regard to the age of the parties and the validity of their marriage, respondent Nos.3 to 6 are restrained from taking petitioner No.2(husband) into custody, pertaining to the allegations that he has kidnapped, abducted and raped petitioner No.1(wife), without recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. They are further directed to protect their lives and liberty, in view of the observations of this Court CRM No.M-4501 of 2012 2 in case Pardeep Kumar and another Versus State of Haryana and others, 2008 (3) RCR(Criminal) 376. At the same time, respondent Nos.7 to 12 are restrained from interfering in the peaceful living/lives of the petitioners.

The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Needless to say, the copies of the order be given dasti to the parties under the signatures of the Reader attached to this Court.



February 15, 2012                                        (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR)
seema                                                          JUDGE
 CRM No.M-4501 of 2012                                     3

            CRM No.9664 of 2012 in
            CRM No.M-4501 of 2012


Present:    Mr.Harender Singh, Advocate,
            for the petitioners.

            ****

            Application is allowed as prayed for.


February 15, 2012                                   (MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR)
seema                                                     JUDGE