Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Heirs Of Chothabhai Punjabhai Kukadiya vs Pathan Azizkhan Habibullakhan & on 10 May, 2013

Author: Jayant Patel

Bench: Jayant Patel

  
	 
	 HEIRS OF CHOTHABHAI PUNJABHAI KUKADIYA....Applicant(s)V/SPATHAN AZIZKHAN HABIBULLAKHAN
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/MCA/701/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR
DIRECTION) NO. 701 of 2013
 


 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

In
			CIVIL APPLICATION NO.  6177 of 2010
		
	
	 
		 
			 

In
			FIRST APPEAL NO. 2646 of 2003
		
	

 


 


 


With 

 


MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 702 of
2013
 


  In    

 


CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6176 of 2010
 

==============================================================
 


HEIRS OF CHOTHABHAI PUNJABHAI
KUKADIYA....Applicant(s)
 


Versus
 


PATHAN AZIZKHAN HABIBULLAKHAN  & 
5....Opponent(s)
 

==============================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
PJ YAGNIK, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No.
1,1.1,1.2,1.4,1.6,1.8,1.1.1,,,,,,1.1.2,1.9,1.7,1.5,1.3
 

MR
RAJNI H MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 4
 

==============================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				SMT. JUSTICE ABHILASHA KUMARI
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 10/05/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER :

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) We have heard Mr. Yagnik for the applicant and Mr.Parikh for Mr.Mehta for respondent no.4(main contesting party).
Considering the facts and circumstances, it appears that the order of disbursement of the interest is already passed. However, for one of the person, there is no authority of the Power of Attorney.
It has been stated that there are 11 sharers of the compensation excluding sub-sharers of 1/11. Therefore, we find it proper to observe that the amount which may be required to be disbursed will be divided into 11 equal shares and out of those each share, the amount will be disbursed to the Power of Attorney to the extent he is representing that particular share. If authority of applicant no.1/8 Mr.Gordhanbhai Chothabhai Kukadia is not there, his amount shall continue to remain as invested separately. For the remaining, if authority is produced, the amount of interest may be disbursed.
It is also observed that if respondent no.1/8 Mr.Gordhanbhai Chothabhai Kukadia is desirous to withdraw the amount separately he shall be at the liberty to withdraw the amount after production of his proof of identity and bank account.
Applications disposed of accordingly. D.S. permitted.
(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (SMT. ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.) bjoy Page 2 of 2