Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Jharkhand High Court

Krishnanand Mishra vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 28 November, 2016

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI      
                                              A.C. (SB) Case No. 1 of 2015

                     Krishnanand Mishra S/o Late Yashoda Nandan Mishra     ...... Petitioner 
                                                                    Versus 
                     1.

 The State of Jharkhand

2. Secretary of Managing Committee of High School, Khunti toli,      P.O. Khunti toli, P.S. & Dist.­Simdega

3. Headmaster of High School Khuntitoli,      P.O. Khunti toli P.S. and Dist.­ Simdega          ...... Respondents                                            ­­­­­­­­­ CORAM:  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA ­­­­­­­­­ For the Petitioner            : Mr.  Pawas Chandra Deshvarty, Advocate For the Respondents       :  Mr. Amit Kumar, J.C. to G.P.­II    Mr. Manoj Prasad, Advocate  ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­  09/ 28.11.2016 This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.03.2011 passed in Case  No.37 of 2007 (JET), by the Jharkhand Education Tribunal, Ranchi.

Heard   the   counsel   for   the   appellant   as   well   as  the   respondents.     The  impugned order reads as under:­ "Petitioner himself is present and filed his attendance. This   case   was   heard   by   this   court   thereafter   he   went   to   the   Hon'ble   Jharkhand   High   Court   where   his   appeal   was   dismissed   then   he   went to the Hon'ble Supreme Court where this case is pending.  In   the circumstance,  this case cannot  be open  here.    He should  file   result of the case and thereafter, the case opening or not opening   will be considered.

With this observation this case is disposed of."

It   is   abundantly   clear   that   by   the   impugned   order   there   has   been   no  adjudication on merit of the case rather the Tribunal has kept the matter open  directing the appellant to file the status report of the case pending before the  Supreme Court.  The order has not attained finality and hence this appeal is not  maintainable and is hereby dismissed. 

                      

                            (Amitav K. Gupta, J.)                 NKC