Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Prataprai M Jagwani & vs Union Of India Through on 17 October, 2013

Bench: Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.B.Pardiwala

  
	 
	 PRATAPRAI M JAGWANIV/SUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF FINANCE
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	C/SCA/261/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


SPECIAL CIVIL
APPLICATION  NO. 261 of 2013
 


 


 

================================================================
 


PRATAPRAI M JAGWANI  & 
1....Petitioner(s)
 


Versus
 


UNION OF INDIA THROUGH
MINISTRY OF FINANCE  &  1....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
VISHWAS K SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioners
 

MR
DP JOSHI ADVOCATE for the Respondent No. 1
 

SINGHI
& CO, ADVOCATE for the Respondent No. 2
 

================================================================
 

 


 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE THE
				CHIEF JUSTICE MR. BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

and
			
		
		 
			 
				 

 

				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
			
		
	

 


 

 


Date : 17/10/2013
 


 

 


ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) It is stated by Mr. Shah, the learned advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioners that in view of the settlement arrived at between his clients and the respondent-Bank, he has instructions not to proceed with this application.

Such being the position, we dismiss this application as not pressed. Notice is discharged. Interim relief granted earlier is vacated.

It appears that while passing interim order on 15th January, 2013, we directed the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs. 5.00 Lac before the Tribunal below and we are told that the petitioners have already deposited such amount before the Tribunal below. According to the terms of settlement, the respondent-Bank will be entitled to withdraw the said amount.

Thus, we direct the Tribunal below to pay the said amount in favour of the respondent-Bank by virtue of the above settlement within a fortnight from today.

Copy of the settlement arrived between the parties as well as the written instruction given by the petitioners to Mr. Shah be kept with the record.

(BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, CJ.) (J.B.PARDIWALA, J.) pirzada Page 2 of 2