Madras High Court
V.Bharathazhwar vs The Special Tahsildar on 7 December, 2023
Author: N.Anand Venkatesh
Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh
W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021
and
W.M.P.(MD).Nos.2058 and 2059 of 2021
1.V.Bharathazhwar
2.Vijayalakshmi
3.Venkataramanujam
4.Dhanalakshmi
5.V.Srinivasan ... Petitioners
Vs.
1.The Special Tahsildar,
Land Acquisition,
Sipcot Alagu – 5,
Iruppu, Sattur,
Virudhunagar District.
2.The District Collector,
Virudhunagar District.
3.The Secretary to the Government of Tamilnadu,
Industries Department,
Fort St.George,
Chennai -1.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021
4.The Special District Revenue Officer,
(Land Acquisition) SIPCOT, Virudhunagar.
5.State Industries Promotion Corporation
of Tamil Nadu Limited, (SIPCOT),
Represented by its Managing Director,
19A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road,
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondents
(R-5 is impleaded vide Court Order dated 07.12.2023
in W.M.P.(MD).No.12421 of 2021 in W.P.(MD).No.2476 of 2021)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the fourth respondent in
dated 06.07.2015 made in No.D1/21962/10 U-5/B-3/15 and quash the said
impugned notification of the respondents as illegal and without jurisdiction.
For Petitioners : Mr.G.Ravisankar
For R-1 to R-3 : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia
Special Government Pleader
For R-4 and R-5 : Mr.M.Gangatharan
Standing Counsel
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned notification of the fourth respondent dated 06.07.2015 whereby the property belonging to the petitioners was acquired under Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997.
2/5https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the impleaded fifth respondent submitted that the acquisition proceeding has been completed and the land has also been handed over to the SIPCOT and the compensation amount has also been determined and deposited. The written instructions received from the first respondent was also placed before this Court.
3. In the considered view of this Court, this Court does not find any illegality in the procedure that was adopted by the respondents for acquisition of the property belonging to the petitioners. Hence, there is no question of interfering with the notification issued by the fourth respondent through proceedings dated 06.07.2015. That apart, the acquisition proceedings itself has been completed and the award has also been determined and deposited. In view of the same, it will be left open to the petitioners to withdraw the award amount lying before the Principal District Court, Srivilliputhurr.
3/5https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021
4. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
07.12.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no Nsr To
1.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Sipcot Alagu – 5, Iruppu, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.
2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District.
3.The Secretary to the Government of Tamilnadu, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -1.
4.The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition) SIPCOT, Virudhunagar.
5.The Managing Director, State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited, (SIPCOT), 19A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
4/5https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.
Nsr W.P.(MD)No.2476 of 2021 07.12.2023 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis