Himachal Pradesh High Court
Shashi Devi W/O Sh. Rakesh Kumar vs The State Of Himachal on 22 February, 2022
Author: Chief Justice
Bench: Chief Justice
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 22nd DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022
.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 465 of 2022
Between:-
SHASHI DEVI W/O SH. RAKESH KUMAR,
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE & POST OFFICE BADHANI,
TEHSIL BHORANJ, DISTRICT HAMIRPUR, H.P.
PRESENTLY WORKING AS TGT (ARTS) AT GOVT.
SEN. SEC. SCHOOL BADHANI, TEHSIL BHORANJ,
DISTRICT HAMIRPUR, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
......PETITIONER
(BY SH. RAJESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. STATE OF H.P. THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
(EDUCATION) GOVT. OF H.P. SHIMLA-171002.
2. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY)
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION SHIMLA, H.P.
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY)
DEPUTY DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION HAMIRPUR,
H.P.
4. PRINCIPAL GOVT. SEN. SEC.
SCHOOL BADHANI, TEHSIL BHORANJ,
DISTRICT HAMIRPUR, HIMACHAL PRADESH.
.....RESPONDENTS
::: Downloaded on - 22/02/2022 20:12:21 :::CIS
2
(BY SH. ASHOK SHARMA, ADVOCATE GENERAL
WITH SH. VIKAS RATHORE, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL)
.
_______________________________________________________
This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble
Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, passed the following:
ORDER
Notice. Mr. Vikas Rathore, learned Additional Advocate respondents r to General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue in question is squarely covered by the judgment rendered in CWP No. 1853 of 2009-D, titled as Arpana Bali vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 10th April, 2013 and the said judgment, in turn, stands implemented by the respondents. This is a matter, which is required to be considered by the employer.
3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the case of the petitioner in light of the averments made in this petition and, more particularly, the judgment rendered in Arpana Bali's case, which stands implemented. Needful be done within four weeks and in case the petitioner is similarly situated to Arpana Bali's case, then consequential action be taken within two weeks.
::: Downloaded on - 22/02/2022 20:12:21 :::CIS 34. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any.
.
For compliance, to come up on 24.03.2022.
( Mohammad Rafiq )
Chief Justice
r to ( Jyotsna Rewal Dua )
Judge
22nd February, 2022(vs/rohit)
::: Downloaded on - 22/02/2022 20:12:21 :::CIS