Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

The Hanuman Estates Ltd. vs National Insurance Company Ltd. on 9 May, 2016

Bench: Jagdish Singh Khehar, C. Nagappan

                                                                                                       1

     ITEM NO.39                                 COURT NO.3                         SECTION XVI

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                 I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s)   for                   Special     Leave      to     Appeal        (C)           No(s).
     12479-12480/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/02/2016
     in GA No. 3888/2015 15/02/2016 in APOT No. 310/2015 passed by the
     High Court Of Calcutta)

     THE HANUMAN ESTATES LTD.                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                       VERSUS

     NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.                    Respondent(s)
     (with appln. (s) for permission to place addl. documents on record
     and interim relief)

     Date : 09/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN


     For Petitioner(s)               Mr.    Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv.
                                     Mr.    A. Mehraria, Adv.
                                     Ms.    Rishika Singh, Adv.
                                     Ms.    Tannishtha Singh, Adv.
                                     for    M/s. Meharia & Company

     For Respondent(s)

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Since the impugned order is an interim arrangement made by the High Court, we find no justification to interfere therewith.

Be that as it may, it is apparent from the impugned order itself that a direction was issued to list the appeal for hearing within eight weeks.

Signature Not Verified

We are informed, that the appeal has not been Digitally signed by PARVEEN KUMAR Date: 2016.05.09 listed 17:11:18 IST Reason: for hearing after the impugned order was passed on 15.02.2016. We therefore hereby direct the High Court to list the appeal for hearing as directed by the impugned order dated 2 15.02.2016 immediately after the summer vacation, subject to the petitioner's placing a certified copy of this order on the record of the High Court.

Disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Renuka Sadana)                       (Parveen Kumar)
 Court Master                            AR-cum-PS