Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Central Information Commission

Mr. Thakur Rajeshwar Singh vs Kvs on 25 November, 2013

                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                      Club Building (Near Post Office)
                    Old JNU Campus, New Delhi-110067
                           Tel: +91-11-26105682


                    File No.CIC/DS/A/2011/003028/RM


Appellant:                               Shri Thakur Rajeshwar Singh,
                                         New Delhi


Public Authority:                        KVS, New Delhi


Date of Hearing:                         30.10.2012


Date of decision:                        25.11.2013



Heard today, dated 30.10.2012.

Appellant is present.

The Public Authority is represented by Shri Y Arun Kumar, Assistant
Commissioner(Vig.& Academic)

The above parties were heard and records perused.

FACTS

Vide RTI dt 8.6.11, appellant had sought information on five points relating to action taken on a CVC letter dt 3.9.10.

2. PIO vide letter dt 1.7.11, provided a response to query no.1 and with regard to queries 2-5, observed that as the matter was under

investigation, the information was exempt u/s 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act.

3. An appeal was filed on 10.7.11.

1

4. AA vide order dt 5.8.11, upheld the decision of the PIO.

5. Not satisfied with the response, he filed the present appeal.

6. Submissions made by the appellant and public authority were heard. The appellant submitted that the response provided by the then PIO Shri S.S.Rawat is incorrect as at that point of time no action had been initiated on the letter received from CVC.

7. Shri Y Arun Kumar, Assistant Commissioner (Vig & Academic) is directed to provide a written submission to the Commission, within a week, after ascertaining the position from the records available. It must be clarified as to whether the response provided by the then PIO is correct or otherwise. The Commission shall take a view, once the submissions are received.

Sd/-

(Rajiv Mathur) Central Information Commissioner 25.11.2013

8. The Commission is in receipt of written submission dt 16.11.12 from Shri Y.Arun Kumar, Asstt Commissioner (Vig & Acad) and taken on record. On perusal of the same, we find that the investigation process was already initiated prior to the date of filing of RTI.

DECISION

9. The Commission upholds the decision of the PIO/AA. The appeal is disposed of Sd/-

(Rajiv Mathur) Central Information Commissioner 2 Authenticated true copy forwarded to:

The Education Officer(Vig) & CPIO Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan(HQ), 18, Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110016.
The Joint Commissioner & FAA Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan(HQ), 18, Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110016.
Shri Thakur Rajeshwar Singh, 66 South Enclave, New Delhi-110062.

(Raghubir Singh) Deputy Registrar .11.2013 3