Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

M/S Dishnet Wireless Ltd vs The Union Of India & Ors on 19 December, 2012

Author: Shailesh Kumar Sinha

Bench: Shailesh Kumar Sinha

      Patna High Court CWJC No.22824 of 2012 (2) dt.19-12-2012




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22824 of 2012
                  ======================================================
                  M/S Dishnet Wireless Ltd, A Company Incorporated Under The Inidan Companies Act,
                  1956 And Having Its Registered Office At 5th Floor, Spencer Plaza, 769 Anna Salai,
                  Chennai- 600002 And Branch Office At 5th And 6th Floor, Sai Corporate Park, Rishi
                  Vatka Rukanpura, Patna- 800014, Through Its Authorized Represntative/ Signator Sir
                  Sanjay Sachivendra                                      .... .... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  1. The Union Of India Ministry Of Communication & Information Technology,
                  Department Of Telecommunications (Access Service Cell) Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashok
                  Road, New Delhi- 110001
                  2. Telecom Enforcement, Resources & Monitoring Cell, Bihar 7th Floor, Telephone
                  Bhawan, R- Block, Patna- 800001                         .... .... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA
                                 ORAL ORDER

2   19-12-2012

Learned counsels for the parties are present.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Union of India raised an objection that the subject matter of this writ application arises out of a telephone matter, and as such, as per the extant roaster this writ application could not be placed under "Group IV". The correct roaster would be "Group-V".

In this regard a report was called for from the Joint Registrar, List and Computer, who enquired the matter and reported that the matter was listed under "Group-IV" by mistake instead of "Group-V".

In view of the above, let the matter be placed before the appropriate Bench under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice on reopening of the Court after Christmas holidays on 4th January, 2013 under the same heading.

    Manish/-                                             (Shailesh Kumar Sinha, J)