Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.R.Andu Gowder vs Saroja on 19 December, 2018

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                        1


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                Dated       : 19.12.2018

                                                  CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

                                        C.R.P.(NPD).No.1396 of 2013
                                                    and
                                              M.P.No.1 of 2013

                 1.K.R.Andu Gowder
                 2.Seenilakshmi
                 3.Drowpathi                        ...                    Petitioners
                                                    Vs.

                 1.Saroja
                 2.Kamala
                 3.Gangadevi
                   H.Krishnan (Since Deceased)
                 4.H.Nagulan
                 5.K.Subramani @ Saibaba
                 6.B.Devan
                 7.K.Sundari
                 8.K.Ranganath
                 9.K.Premkumar
                 10.Ammuammal
                 11.K.R.Chandran
                 12.K.R.Arjunan
                 13.K.R.Haldorai
                 14.K.R.Ramesh                      ...                    Respondents


                 Prayer :- The Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of
                 the Constitution of India against the order dated 31.10.2012 passed in
                 I.A.No.212 of 2009 in O.S.No.57 of 2008 on the file of the Subordinate
                 Judge, The Nilgiris.


                              For Petitioners                 : Mr.P.R.Balasubramanian


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                         2

                                                                       ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

                                                                                           sms


                                                       ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks further adjournment for arguing the matter. Even on the earlier occasion on 04.12.2018, there was no representation on the side of the petitioners. Right from 15.11.2018, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has been seeking adjournment to argue the matter. It can now be inferred that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the revision petition.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                 Index : Yes / No
                 Internet : Yes / No                                         19.12.2018
                 sms

                 To


The Subordinate Judge, The Nilgiris.

C.R.P.(NPD).No.1396 of 2013

and M.P.No.1 of 2013 http://www.judis.nic.in