Patna High Court - Orders
Purushottam Pandey vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 September, 2014
Author: Sharan Singh
Bench: Sharan Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14364 of 2010
======================================================
Purushottam Pandey S/O Shri Brij Kumar Pandey R/O Vill Milki Mukswat,
P.O.Saraon, P.S.Natwar, Distt-Rohtas
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department
Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. Additional Secretary, Higher Education, Human Resources Development
Department Government of Bihar, Patna
4. Deputy Secretary, Human Resources Development Department
Government Of Bihar, Patna
5. Director, Higher Education , Human Resources Development Department
Government Of Bihar, Patna
6. The Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary) Through Its
Secretary Patna
7. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board(Higher Secondary)
Patna
8. Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board(Higher Secondary) Patna
9. The Indu Tapeshwar Singh Mahila College Bikramganj, Rohtas
Through Its Secretary, Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Bikramganj, Rohtas
10. Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh S/O Late Tapeshwar Singh Secretary, Indu
Tapeshwar Singh Mahila College, Bikramganj, Rohtas, Residing At Asni
Bhawan, East Boring Canal Road, Patna-1
11. Upendra Prasad Singh S/O Late Rajdeo Singh Indu Tapeshwar Singh
Mahila College ,Bikramganj, Rohtas, Residing At Mohalla Gajrarh,
Gaurakshani,P.O.+P.S. Sasaram ,Distt-Rohtas
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abdul Wadood
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Tripurari Nath Ambastha, A.C. to G.P.14
Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI
SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 12-09-2014Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents No. 9 to 11 has raised a preliminary objection over maintainability of the writ application on the ground that Indu Tapeshwar Singh Mahila College, Bikramganj, Rohtas is a privately managed institution and no writ would lie under Article 226 of the Patna High Court CWJC No.14364 of 2010 (5) dt.12-09-2014 P2/2 Constitution of India in the facts and circumstances of the case.
I find substance in submission. The petitioner's main grievance is apparently against Managing Committee of Indu Tapeshwar Singh Mahila College, Bikramganj, Rohtas which is admittedly privately managed institution.
This application is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable.
Needless to say that the petitioner shall have liberty to approach appropriate forum for redressal of the grievance in accordance with law.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Saif/-
U