Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Income Tax Officer vs Kayathwal Estate Private Limited on 14 February, 2022

Bench: M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

     ITEM NO.13                        Court 12 (Video Conferencing)                    SECTION III

                                       S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                           No.    882/2022

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-02-2021
     in R/SCA No. 19454/2019 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at
     Ahmedabad)

     INCOME TAX OFFICER                                                            Petitioner(s)

                                                           VERSUS

     KAYATHWAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED                                              Respondent(s)

     ( IA No.9536/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
     JUDGMENT )

     Date : 14-02-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                                HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

     For Petitioner(s)                      Mr. Balbir Singh, ASG
                                            Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.
                                             Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv.
                                            Ms. Suhasini Sen, Adv.
                                            Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv
                                            Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

Having heard Shri Balbir Singh, learned ASG and in the facts and circumstances of the case more particularly at the time of Scrutiny Assessment under Section 143(3), the Assessing Officer had asked for the details regarding the unsecured loan taken by the Assessee during the year under Signature Not Verified consideration and the Assessee furnished the details as asked Digitally signed by R for and thereafter, after perusing the details so furnished by Natarajan Date: 2022.02.16 17:03:09 IST Reason:

the Assessee, the Assessing Officer passed an order under contd..
- 2 -
Section 143(3) of the Act. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was any suppression on the part of the Assessee in not disclosing true an correct facts. It is required to be noted that even the re-assessment proceeding were initiated beyond the period of four years. Under the circumstances, the High Court is absolutely justified in quashing the re-assessment proceedings and the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. No interference of this Court is called for in exercise of powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
With this, the Special Leave petition stands dismissed. of.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(NEETU SACHDEVA)                                 (NISHA TRIPATHI)
COURT MASTER (SH)                                 BRANCH OFFICER