Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sunil Kumar Panchal vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 19 May, 2017

Author: Dinesh Mehta

Bench: Dinesh Mehta

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5405 / 2017
Sunil Kumar Panchal S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Village & Post Paderi, Via Arthuna, Tehsil Gari, District
Banswara (Raj.) At Present Working As Teacher G-III At Govt.
Primary School Ghaneva Chhota (Sundrav), Block Anandpuri,
Distt. Banswara.
                                                         ----Petitioner
                               Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through the Secretary, Rural Development
and Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. State of Rajasthan Through the Secretary,, Department of
Rajasthan Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan

3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner

4. District Elementary Education,, Banswara.

5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Banswara, Rajasthan.

6. Chairman,, District Establishment Committee, Zila Prishad,
Banswara, Rajasthan.
                                                     ----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s)   : Mr. BS Deora
For Respondent(s) : Mr. SS Ladrecha AAG with Mr. Vikas
                    Choudhary.
_____________________________________________________
                    JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
                        Judgment / Order
19/05/2017

     Counsel for the rival parties are ad idem that the controversy

involved in the present case is covered by the order passed today,

in a bunch of cases, led by SBCWP No. 4031/2017 (Sandeep

Kumar Bishnoi & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.).

     In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed in terms of
                               (2 of 2)
                                                      [CW-5405/2017]

the judgment aforesaid and the respondents are       directed to

undertake the exercise      of confirming the petitioner(s)     as

contemplated under Rule 27-B of the Rajasthan Service Rules,

1958. The needful be done within a period of three months from

today.

     No order as to cost.

                                           (DINESH MEHTA), J.