Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

R.Dhanalakshmi vs Union Bank Of India on 28 January, 2021

Author: A.M.Badar

Bench: A.M.Badar

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT

                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BADAR

     THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 8TH MAGHA, 1942

                       OP (DRT).No.105 OF 2020

   AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN TA 1412/2016 OF DEBT RECOVERY
                       TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM


PETITIONERS:

      1        R.DHANALAKSHMI
               AGED 80 YEARS
               M/S SEEMATTI TEXTILES,
               KOLLAM-691001, NOW AT ARAYACHAMVEEDU, KOTTAMUKKU,
               KACHERI P O, KOLLAM-691013.

      2        R VEERESH KUMAR
               DHANAMS,
               CURZON ROAD, KOLLAM-691001.
               NOW AT ARYACHAMVEEDU, KOTTAMUKKU, KACHERI P O,
               KOLLAM-691013.

      3        R ANANTHAKUMAR
               DHANAMS,
               CURZON ROAD, KOLLAM-691001.
               NOW AT ARYACHAMVEEDU, KOTTAMUKKU, KACHERI P O,
               KOLLAM-691013.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.S.EASWARAN
               SRI.P.MURALEEDHARAN (IRIMPANAM)
               SMT.K.V.RAJESWARI

RESPONDENTS:

               UNION BANK OF INDIA
               KOLLAM BRANCH, KOLLAM-691001, REPRESENTED BY ITS
               SENIOR MANAGER

               DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II, ERNAKULAM,
               IST FLOOR, K.S.H.B BUILDING, PANAMPILLY NAGAR
               KOCHI-682036, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR

               R1 BY ADV. SRI.SADCHITH.P.KURUP

     THIS OP (DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 28.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 OP (DRT).No.105 OF 2020

                                    2

                                 JUDGMENT

Dated this the 28th day of January 2021 Learned counsel is seeking withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, if permissible under law.

Sd/-

A.M.BADAR Nsd //true copy// JUDGE PA to Judge OP (DRT).No.105 OF 2020 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.10.2017 IN OP (DRT) 120 OF 2016.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.11.2018 IN OP (DRT) 122 OF 2018.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2019 OM AIR 690 & 691 OF 2018 ON THE FILES OF DRAT CHENNAI.
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.12.2019 IN WP 9331/2019 AND CONNECTED CASES.
EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.03.2020 IN AIR 690 & 691 OF 2018 ON THE FILES OF DRAT CHENNAI.
EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.03.2020 IN WA 242 OF 2020 PASSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF TA 1412/2016 WITHOUT ANNEXURES FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE DRT

-2 ERNAKULAM.

EXHIBIT P8 COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.

EXHIBIT P9 COPY OF IA NO 1991 OF 2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE DRT IN TA 1412 OF 2016.

EXHIBIT P10 COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P11 COPY OF THE MEMO FILED IN IA 1991 OF 2019 IN TA 1412 OF 2016.

EXHIBIT P12 COPY OF ORDER DATED 14.10.2020 IN IA 1991/2019 IN TA 1412/2016 PASSED BY THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-2 ERNAKULAM.