Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Nur Aksa Bibi & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 24 July, 2023

Item No.20


                         In The High Court At Calcutta
                         Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                 Appellate Side

24.07.2023
  Ct-24


                                WPA 17007 of 2023
                               Nur Aksa Bibi & Ors.
                                       v.
                        The State of West Bengal & Ors.

             Mr. Dibyendu Chatterjee
             Mr. Pritam Majumder
             Mr. S. Ghosh
                             ...For the petitioners.

             Mr. Santanu Mitra
             Ms. Rama Halder
                                 ... For the State.

             Ms. Sonal Sinha
             Mr. Tarun Kumar Chatterjee
             Mr. Sujit Gupta
             Mr. Sayan Datta
             Mr. Soumen Chatterjee
                          ... for the State Election Commission.

                   The petitioners contested the Panchayat General
             Elections, 2023.

                   They allege violence, booth capturing and several
             other illegalities on the date of the poll. FIR was lodged
             before the police. Complaint was also lodged before the
             Commission.

                   The petitioners allege that the observers of booth
             numbers 140, 141, 142 and 153 took a decision for re-
             poll but the re-poll was cancelled at the instance of the
             ruling dispensation.

                   The petitioners seek re-poll.
                                       2




             Learned     advocate         representing    the    State
      respondents opposes the submissions and allegations

made on behalf of the petitioners.

It has been submitted that all necessary steps were taken by the concerned respondent authorities including post-poll scrutiny, notices were issued and as no adverse report was found, accordingly, decision to conduct re-poll could not be taken.

It appears from the submissions made on behalf of both the parties that there are several disputed questions of fact involved. Evidence is required to be taken to ascertain the genuinity of the grievances of the parties. The same cannot be done in the instant writ petition.

In view of the above, no relief can be granted to the petitioners in the instant writ petition.

The writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.

Dismissal of the writ petition will, however, not stand in the way of the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum by way of an election petition in accordance with law, for redressal of their grievances, if so advised.

The Panchayat Returning Officer is directed to properly preserve the CCTV/Video footages and the ballot papers and produce the same as and when directed.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.

Sh.                                          (Amrita Sinha, J.)