Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Chattisgarh High Court

Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S South Eastern Coalfields Limited 30 ... on 10 January, 2020

Bench: P.R. Ramachandra Menon, Parth Prateem Sahu

                                         1 of 2


                                                                                    NAFR

                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                               TAXC No. 86 of 2019

  •   Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1(1), Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
                                                                        ----Appellant
                                      VERSUS
  •   M/s South Eastern Coalfields Limited Seepat Road, Bilaspur C.G.

                                                                     ----Respondent

For Appellant : Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate, Ms. Naushina Ali, Advocate and Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri P.R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board Per P.R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice.

10/01/2020

1. This appeal has been preferred by the Department of Revenue (Tax) challenging the verdict passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Raipur stating that much substantial questions of law as envisaged under Section 260 A of Income Tax Act, 1961 are involved herein and hence, it requires to be adjudicated by this Court.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned standing counsel submits that because of some oversight, some inadvertant mistake has crept in framing the substantial questions of law, which require to be suggested in a better and precise manner, so as to have effective adjudication by this Court. In the said circumstance, permission of this Court is sought to withdraw this appeal without prejudice to file fresh one raising the pleadings and prayers, including the substantial question of law involved in appropriate terms.

3. The aforesaid prayer is granted. Considering the fact that the appellant has approached this Court and filed the appeal within the time permitted under the 2 of 2 statute, we find it appropriate to grant liberty to the appellant to file fresh proceedings as corrected and modified to the requisite extent within a further period of six weeks from today.

4. Subject to the above, this appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the orders passed by the Tribunal and the service certificate to the learned standing counsel for proceeding with further steps.

                     Sd/-                                              Sd/-
           (P.R. Ramachandra Menon)                            (Parth Prateem Sahu)
                 Chief Justice                                        Judge


Pawan