Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ashish Ranjan vs Union Of India . on 19 June, 2017

Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

                                                 1

               ITEM NO. 37                 COURT NO. 4             SECTION X

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

               WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 76/2015

               ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.                                 Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS
               UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                                Respondent(s)

               IN THE MATTER OF
               MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY                    Applicant

               (For intervention/impleadment on IA 47012/2017, for
               clarification/direction on IA 47013/2017)

               Date : 19/06/2017   This/These petition/petition(s) was/were
                                       called on for hearing today.
               CORAM :
                         HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                                     (VACATION BENCH)

               For Applicant(s)     Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Adv.
                                    Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv.

               For Petitioner(s)
                                    Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv.

               For Respondent(s)    Mr. Sanjeev K Pabbi, Adv.
                                    Mr. Shivendu Gaur, Adv.
                                    Ms. Disha Singh, Adv.

                                    Mr.   Ajit Kumar Sinha, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Ajay Sharma, adv.
                                    Ms.   Rekha Pandey, Adv.
                                    Mr.   R.K. Rathore, Adv.
                                    Mr.   G.S. Makker, Adv.

                                    Mr.   T. Singhdev, Adv.
                                    Mr.   Gaurav Sharma, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                    Ms.   Amandeep Kaur, Adv.
Digitally signed by                 Mr.   Prateek Bhatia, Adv.
CHARANJEET KAUR
Date: 2017.06.20
16:17:55 IST                        Mr.   Dhawal Mohan, Adv.
Reason:
                                    Mr.   Tarun Verma, Adv.
                                    Ms.   Vara Gaur, Adv.

                                    Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Adv.

                                    Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv.
                                     2


                     Mr. Gopal Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                      O R D E R

The relief which has been sought by the applicant, Maharishi Markandeshwar University is in the following terms :

“Permit the applicant to fill up the 33 seats lying vacant in MD/MS/PG Diploma Courses and 23 seats are lying in MDS Course for the academic year 2017-18 from the NEET qualified students who are pre-registered or not with the State of Haryana by 15th June, 2017.” During the course of the hearing, the Court is apprised of the fact that the first round of counselling for post graduate seats in Haryana took place on 30.05.2017, while the second round of counselling took place on 6/7.06.2017. Thereafter, a 'mop up' round took place on 09.06.2017.

This Court in its decision in Ashish Ranjan and Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (W.P.(C) 76/2014) reported in (2016) 11 SCC 225, has laid down a time schedule to be followed for completing admission to medical colleges.

On 13.06.2017, this Court in Association of Private Medical and Dental Colleges of Chhattisgarh vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. (SLP(C) No. 3 16282/2017) declined to grant a further extension of time beyond what is prescribed in the judgment of this Court in Ashish Ranjan (supra). This Court observed as follows :

“In Ashish Ranjan & Ors. v.
Union of Inda & Ors. [WP(C) No. 76/2015], this Court laid down a schedule to be followed for admission to medical colleges. This schedule, as approved by this Court, must be followed to ensure that medical education standards are not lowered as per the schedule laid down in Ashish Ranjan case (supra).” On the aspect of seats remaining vacant, the Court observed as follows:
              “Seats   remain    vacant    in
              Medical colleges for various
              reasons.     Doctors are not
              willing to take admission in
              non-clinical            courses
especially in private colleges where fees are very high. In our view, the schedule must be strictly followed and we find no reason to extend the time.” We respectfully concur with the above view. We are satisfied in the facts of the present case that there is no reason to grant of further extension.
Any such extension will breach the time schedule prescribed by this Court in Ashish Ranjan (supra).
Moreover, having regard to the fact that two rounds of counselling have taken place in Haryana and a mop up round also followed thereafter, there is no merit 4 in I.A. No. 47013/2017. The same is accordingly dismissed. Accordingly, I.A. No. 47012 of 2017 for intervention is also dismissed.
[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ Sharda Kapoor ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar