Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Selvi vs The District Siddha Medical Officer on 29 January, 2020

Author: M.Govindaraj

Bench: M.Govindaraj

                                                                            WP.No.24973 of 2010

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             DATED: 29.01.2020

                                                    CORAM

                                THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

                                           W.P.No.24973 of 2010
                                                    and
                                          M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2010


                 M.Selvi                                                      ... Petitioner


                                                      Vs.



                 1.The District Siddha Medical Officer,
                   Vellore District, Vellore.

                 2.The District Employment Officer,
                   Vellore District, Vellore.

                 3.V.Gnanaoli                                                 ... Respondents



                 Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                 praying to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records in
                 pursuant to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in
                 proceedings Na.Ka.No.2140/A.Ka/09 dated 24.02.09 and quash the same
                 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to appoint the petitioner to the
                 post of Hospital worker with all attendant and other consequential service
                 benefits or in alternate direct the 1st respondent to appoint the petitioner
                 as Hospital Worker in Vellore District with all service benefits.




http://www.judis.nic.in
                 1/4
                                                                                WP.No.24973 of 2010

                                  For Petitioner  : Mr.T.Dharani
                                  For Respondents : Mr.R.Janaki
                                                    Additional Government Pleader
                                                    [for RR1 &2]
                                                        *****

                                                       ORDER

The petitioner has registered himself with 2nd respondent / employment exchange under the category of MBC priority category, after having passed SSLC examination. It appears that the 1 st respondent called for candidates from employment exchange for the post of Hospital workers. From the counter of the 2nd respondent, it is seen that the 1st respondent has called for candidates, who have passed 8th and 9th standard and failed 10th standard. However, the petitioner, who has passed 10th standard was sponsored under BC priority category. Therefore, the 1st respondent appointed the 3rd respondent under MBC category to the post of Hospital worker.

2. According to the petitioner, she is senior to the 3rd respondent having registered in the year 1997 and the 3rd respondent registered himself only in the year 2014. Therefore, the sponsor and selection conducted by the 1st and 2nd respondents is illegal and liable to be set aside. As a consequential prayer, the petitioner seeks appointment in the place of 3rd respondent or in the alternative to post in any other place in Vellore District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 2/4 WP.No.24973 of 2010

3. First respondent has called for candidates with specified qualification. The requirement is 10th standard fail. The petitioner does not fall within the qualification as she over qualified by passing 10th standard. Further, the 2nd respondent was sponsored under BC category. The selection and appointment made by the 1 st respondent was for MBC category. On consideration selection of the 3rd respondent who was sponsored as MBC priority quota having inter caste marriage cannot be found fault with.

4. A perusal of the community certificate issued by the Revenue Department as well as the counter filed by the 2nd respondent clearly discloses that the petitioner belongs to MBC category and she married the other community person. She was also eligible to be appointed, provided she was not over qualified. However, the appointment had taken place in the year 2010 and it cannot be interfered at this point.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would produce a notification issued by the employment exchange in Advertisement No.01/2020 dated 09.01.2020 for the post of Office Assistant. There are 8 plus 1 post available in Vellore District.

http://www.judis.nic.in 3/4 WP.No.24973 of 2010 M.GOVINDARAJ, J.

bri

6. Therefore, a direction is given to the 2nd respondent to sponsor the petitioner's name also to the post of Office Assistant to be filled in by District Co-operative Bank and Town Co-operative Bank, Vellore.

With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.





                                                                                    29.01.2020


                 bri

                 Index    : yes/No
                 Internet : Yes
                 Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order

                 Note: Issue order copy on 10.02.2020

                 To

                 1.The District Siddha Medical Officer,
                   Vellore District, Vellore.

                 2.The District Employment Officer,
                   Vellore District, Vellore.


                                                                        W.P.No.24973 of 2010


http://www.judis.nic.in
                 4/4