Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Manjula vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 25 February, 2020

Author: R.Subbiah

Bench: R.Subbiah

                                                                              H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019



                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 25.02.2020

                                                      CORAM

                                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH
                                                and
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN

                                               H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019
                      Manjula
                      W/o.Magesh                                               ... Petitioner
                                                         Vs
                      1.State of Tamil Nadu
                        represented by its Secretary,
                        Prohibition and Excise Department,
                        Fort St.George, Chennai – 600009.

                      2.The Commissioner of Police,
                        Greater Chennai Police,
                        Chennai.

                      3.The Inspector of Police,
                        S-8, Adambakkam Police Station,
                        Chennai.                                               ... Respondents

                             Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records of the
                      detention order dated 01.10.2019 in detention order in BCDFGISSSV
                      No.634 of 2019 on the file of second respondent herein and quash the
                      same and direct the respondents herein to produce the body of the detenu


                      1/6
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                               H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019



                      viz., Arun S/o.Magesh, aged about 21 years, who is now confined at
                      Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and set him at liberty.


                                   For Petitioner     :       Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan
                                   For Respondents :          Mr.R.Prathap Kumar
                                                              Additional Public Prosecutor
                                                          *****

                                                     ORDER

[Order of this Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J] Petitioner is the mother of the detenu viz., Arun S/o.Magesh, aged 23 years, who has been branded as a ‘Goonda’ under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and detained under order of second respondent passed in BCDFGISSSV No.634 of 2019 dated 01.10.2019.

2. The detenu came to adverse notice in the following cases:

Sl. Police Station and Crime No. Section of Law No.
1. S-8 Adambakkam Police 379 IPC Station, Cr.No.260/2018
2. S-8 Adambakkam Police 379 IPC Station, Cr.No.261/2018
3. S-8 Adambakkam Police 379 IPC Station, Cr.No.635/2018 2/6 http://www.judis.nic.in H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019 Sl. Police Station and Crime No. Section of Law No.
4. S-8 Adambakkam Police 341, 294(b), 323, Station, Cr.No.468/2019 384 and 506(ii) IPC The alleged ground case has been registered against the detenu in Crime No.485 of 2019 on the file of S-8 Adambakkam Police Station for offences u/s.147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 397, 427, 336 and 506(ii) IPC.

Aggrieved by the order of detention, the present writ petition has been filed.

3. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents. Perused the materials on record.

4. Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, learned counsel for petitioner mainly focussed his argument on the ground that the arrest of the detenu has been intimated to his father through SMS. However, to establish the same, no proof has been produced, which would vitiate the detention. 3/6 http://www.judis.nic.in H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019

5. We have heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the above submissions.

6. In the light of the fact that there is no proof for establishing that the arrest of the detenu was duly informed to his father, we have no hesitation in quashing the order of detention.

Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the detention order passed by the second respondent against the detenu viz., Arun S/o.Magesh, in BCDFGISSSV No.634 of 2019 dated 01.10.2019, is set aside. The above named detenu is ordered to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his custody is required in connection with any other case.

                                                                   [R.P.S., J]          [T.K.R., J]
                                                                              25.02.2020
                      Index:yes/no,
                      Internet:yes
                      gm




                      4/6
http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                             H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019




                      To

                      1.The Secretary,

Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Chennai.

3.The Inspector of Police, S-8, Adambakkam Police Station, Chennai.

4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

5/6 http://www.judis.nic.in H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019 R.SUBBIAH, J and RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J gm H.C.P.No.2481 of 2019 25.02.2020 6/6 http://www.judis.nic.in