Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

P.Manojkumar vs The Secretary

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

    THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017/9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1939

                     WP(C).No. 4863 of 2010 (G)
                     ---------------------------


PETITIONER:
-----------

            P.MANOJKUMAR,S/O.PUSHPANGADAN,
            KRISHNASREE,PANDAKASALA,CHIRAYINKIL.P.O,,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

            BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.BABY
                    SRI.R.KIRAN


RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. THE SECRETARY,VAKKOM SOUTH COIR
            VYAVASAYA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.NO.T.537,
            VAKKOM SOUTH,CHIRAYINKIL.P.O,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

       *  2. P.DIVAKARAN VIDYAN,VADAPPURAM,VAKKOM.PO,
            CHIRAYINKIL.P.O,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.(DELETED)

          *  THE 2ND RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM PARTY ARRAY AT THE
            RESKE OF PETITION AS PER ORDER DATED 6/3/13 IN
            IA NO.3166/13.

          3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR,PROJECT OFFICE
            (COIR),CHIRAYINKIL,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

          4. THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE TRIBUNAL,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

            R1  BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
            R3.R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT PRINCY XAVIER

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
       ON  30-11-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
       FOLLOWING:
K.V.



                 A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
           **********************************************************************
                        W.P.(C) No.4863 of 2010
           **********************************************************************
          Dated this the 30th day of November, 2017

                                    JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had relinquished the Vakkalath and notice may be sent to the petitioner.

If the learned counsel for the petitioner had relinquished the Vakkalath, it is not for this Court to issue notice to the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln /True copy/ P.A.to Judge