Patna High Court - Orders
Kumud Kumar Chaudhary & Ors vs The Union Of India & Ors on 21 October, 2016
Author: Kishore Kumar Mandal
Bench: Kishore Kumar Mandal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8038 of 2014
======================================================
1. Kumud Kumar Chaudhary S/o- Sri Vijay Chaudhary, resident of- Shop
No. A-3, Bazar Samiti, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur
2. Kanhaiya Prasad, S/o- Late Kishun Prasad, resident of- Shop No. A-2,
Bazar Samiti, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur
3. Munna Chaudhary, S/o- Ashok Chaudhary, resident of- Shop No. A-5,
Bazar Samiti, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur
4. Neeraj Kumar, S/o- Sri Vijay Choudhari, resident of- Godown No. 3,
Bazar Samiti, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Union of India
2. Election Commission of India, New Delhi
3. Chief Electoral Officer, Bihar, Patna
4. State Election Commission, Bihar, Patna
5. Collector-cum-Returning Officer, Muzaffarpur
6. Sub-Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Parasmani
For the ECI : Mr. Sidharth Prasad
For the SEC : Mr. Amit Shrivastava,
Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR
MANDAL
ORAL ORDER
2 21-10-2016Mr. Sidharth Prasad appearing on behalf of the respondent-Commission has submitted that the application has lost its relevance. The writ application was filed questioning the notice dated 12.03.2014 issued in connection with the Parliamentary Election held in the State in 2014. The Sub- Divisional Officer East, Muzaffarfpur had issued notice of requisitioned of the premises/shop no. A-5 for election purposes.
On perusal of the statement made in the writ application Patna High Court CWJC No.8038 of 2014 (2) dt.21-10-2016 2/2 and after hearing the submission of the counsel for the Commission, the Court is satisfied that the application has now become infructuous.
The application is dismissed.
Dismissal of this application, shall, however, not preclude the petitioner from ventilating his grievance before the Authority/Forum in accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/-
U