Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Official Liquidator Of M/S Vijaya ... vs Official Liquidator Of M/S H K Datarex ... on 21 February, 2011

E
IN TH E HIGH COURT OF KARNA'I'AK_iX A'? Z3ANGALO,'RI1Z-

DATEID THIS 'I'1"{E%I 2 3  i3A'z' OE?' F'EE3RUARY' 201 1 

I-3Ei3I%'O§R.E§

T}-11:: E-IONEBLEZ MR. JUSTICIS As. ;~>_AcHI«iAI>%}£2'fi'~V.'   ~

COMPANY APFLICATION NOJ54 01%' '2o'i_1,  .
IN _  ._ M _

BETWEEN

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF  
M/S. VIJAYA LEASING LEMITED 

(IN LIQUIDATION),   =  
A'I'"I'Acr«1ED TO HIGH COURT O1? .K;§_xf{N1'¥ {.21-XKA,

"CORPORATE .£-'3HA'v'AN",      
N0.26~27§ 12"" FLOOR,   _ 
RAHIMA TOVS/FjRS--B M---_(}. }:2oAD_f,,:

BANGAL( )I{15:¥ Q<'§'§: '  _   APPLICANT/S

{BY M /s. K.s«. M;~.1-;1}§t§~12i/Tn.:§:"»&»~vi JAYARAM. ADVS}
AND  " ' ' " 

 _ oFF1::;;AL }.*.FQU1I)2~'{FQR OF
 :¢1/s;- «.§~1;L<;..,'-%1)zx*£jAR.Ia>< P}{IVA'I'E93 LIMi'i'I:"£Ii)
 {m'L:Q'u;I>A';*IQ':x:3.
;\_'i"I.'A_CEiI E:;1;>_ * *5)' ::;~1::;;1-V-.1' <:<:>um* cm KAI%{N:X'f;1x}(A

 O?~':I»§ORA'E E': __Ei-3£;1'AVAN 
N0.:::,5--2?,_ 1.2%: EFLOOR.

 V ' _RAriE*;§A :1'*ow1%:r2s, MG. ROAD.
 _  'B'ANGAi;ORP3w 560__.;0o1 .  Rf3SE'ON11)E1N'I'/S

  gig KS, 34.5%;--=;i:zx1.>£2vgaN 5: V. Jm'AEmxz1, s'X§,'}VS.)

COMPANY PETITISSI NG;..126"Q:«~ :2«fi_02     'A



12

Ti-{IS compsawv Ar3r>1,1cA'1_*1o1#e IS i<'Ii,.i:ZD UNDER 9 R/W
RULE: 1"?"2*'01«* '£'i-{Ii COE\fE.PA;\lI.ES (COURT) RUI.,.E€S AND R,/'W
SE%:C'_I"10'§.\i 5 or? 'i'i':I.EZ LI.E\zEI'i's'-XTION Am: I*F%2;W'Ii'siC}- 'i'i-«am i'«='<:>iz
THE REASONS STA'I"i5Z;I) TI--1_1:%::'2£«:1i\1fiifi--£13 i-~10i\i'i3i.,.i_~: C{)UR~'i'--._MA'Y"
BE}: P1,,-IZEASISEJ TO CONI)C)i\E}1~Z 'i'i~i1+: {)E:Lf3x\£':' Oi? 21:2 1':A?yfs..,iN
PRE1E«'E13€RH\I'G 'm:~: CI;AII\»'§ £?'ff:3'1'1'.I'1ON i3i«:F0i~:i«;'  . ij'*£j1iia:vzee:

RESPON[)EN'i' OFFICIAL LIQUH)A'I'OR 01%" /3.;--1'.'1r»:;"'1,)A;:_I1zgRi:X'«_

PRIVATE LI'MITEs":D AND TO I::iR1'«:c'1' TO coixI_s1m2R'- *1";-:i_i:L*

CLAIM AP¥>1,icA'r10N FILESD my TM API°IiIC~:':f\E71::"'~.COMPAN:Y  

ON 1 I 06.2010 IN ACCORDANCE \?'JITi-'-T"I;i"s\,5.s'   

mxs COMPANY Api>i.i<:A'ri<§N 7«.C"c5Mii\:c§ '~.o:\1f'i%'(§14a.'V

ORDERS THIS DAY, TH'I£ coum'.iy1A1:)i:i1jiiiE mi;i,;<;a\2\g1NQ':
ORDEQ" ' ' 

Heard the Ie21i'i";écl._ ('.Otj1 f1S€}-;R).i'-._'t}1E3  The
respondent herein is the :OI:}.i(~EViV'C:1V.1:>I,4i.'q_ii'iVC%:%1t;'flr- Considering

i;h.e: gr01::ir1ds"r12.é:de {}Lii:_4.ii:f'1:he eifficiavit. Eilszd in support of the app}i{i:ai.i'01'i, :.ijV(ié12:yx""cJi"' 112 ciays in submitting the (:1airr1A.p.:.21;it:i<'ii*i ..{l;S"1;§.'€l"{f%)};:C()3I1d()I1€d. CA N<:-154/2011 is é1€<;0"rd£r£gj1:,ré:1.iowed." iiiii H