Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Hari Chand Garg vs State Bank Of Patiala on 19 December, 2011

                                      1



                    Central Information Commission
 Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
            Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in


                   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/001975 


 Appellant /Complainant       :        Shri Hari Chand Garg, Bathinda

Public Authority              :      State Bank of Patiala, Bhatinda/Patiala
                                    (Sh. P.K. Rath, CPIO, Sh. B.R.Tluteja, 
AA,
                                    Sh.rajesh Gupt, CPIO, Sh. S.K. Jain, 
AGM 
                                    Sh. Pawan Gupta, Dy.GM - through 
video
                                    Conferencing)

Date of Hearing               :       19 December 2011   
Date of Decision              :        19 December 2011


Facts:­ 

1. Shri Hari Chand Garg submitted RTI application dated 16 October  2010 before the CPIO, SBI, Bhatinda, seeking the information in respect of  certain arrears of pay and allowances payable to the appellant.

2. Vide CPIO order dated 4 January 2011,     partial information   was  furnished to the Appellant.

3. Not satisfied with the incomplete information, Appellant preferred  appeal dated 10January 2011, before the First Appellate Authority.

4. Vide FAA order dated 7 February 2011, the FAA upheld the order of  the CPIO and informed that the remaining information is being searched  and will be provided by the CPIO in due course.

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/001975    2

5. Being aggrieved and not being satisfied by the above orders the  appellant preferred second appeal before the Commission.

6. Matter   was   heard   today   via   videoconferencing.   Appellant   made  submissions  from  Bathinda.   Respondent  were   present   and   heard   from  Patiala and Bathinda. Respondent stated that they had already provided  information   pertaining  to   seven   years  vide   their   letter   of   15   December  2011. However information in respect of the year 2001 - 02 was still not  traceable. Respondent offered to reconstruct this information and provide  the   same   to   the   appellant.   Appellant,   on   the   other   hand,   pleaded   for  receiving the details of arrears paid to him. He also sought to have a copy  of increment sanction and also a copy of circular of DA.

Decision notice

7. After   hearing   both   parties,   respondent   is   directed   to   provide  information in respect of the year 2001 - 02 after reconstructing the same  and also provide the details of arrears paid to the appellant, provide copy  of increment sanction and a copy of circular of DA to the appellant within  two weeks of receipt of order. Commission observes that this is a very  unhappy situation where the appellant has to lean on the pillar of the RTI  Act   even   to   receive   routine   information  pertaining   to   his   own   pay  and  allowances and arrears. The public authority must retrain their staff to be  more   responsive   to   their   own   employees   pertaining   to   their   routine  personnel and accounts matters.

 (Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/001975    3 Copy to:­
1. Shri Hari Chand Garg     # 260, Bharat Nagar, Bhatinda­151001 (Punjab)
2. The CPIO  State Bank of Patiala Region­III, Zonal Office  Amrit Singh Road, Bathinda (Punjab)
3. The Appellate Authority State Bank of Patiala Head Office, The Mall Patiala­147001 (Punjab)   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/001975